H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 0-4
Catarina Lindqvist Ryan holds a 4–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Catarina Lindqvist Ryan won the 1992 Australian Open first round 7-6(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 1992* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Apr 5, 1989* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-1 6-1 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1986* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-3 6-1 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Jan 14, 1984* | Hershey | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-3 6-1 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |