H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Catherine Tanvier H2H: 0-1
Catherine Tanvier holds a 1–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Catherine Tanvier won the 1984 Orlando third round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1984* | Orlando | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Catherine Tanvier | 6-1 7-5 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Catherine Tanvier | #752 | #20 | 22 | 1,877 | 161 | 179 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Catherine Tanvier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #39 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #96 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #99 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #104 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #105 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #543 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |