H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Elna Reinach H2H: 0-2
Elna Reinach holds a 2–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elna Reinach leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Elna Reinach won the 1988 Hilton Head second round 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 1988* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Elna Reinach | 7-6 6-4 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Mar 31, 1988* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Elna Reinach | 6-4 6-1 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Elna Reinach | #342 | #26 | 33 | 1,865 | 145 | 170 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Elna Reinach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #95 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #56 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #109 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |