H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Joanne Russell H2H: 1-2
Joanne Russell holds a 2–1 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Joanne Russell leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Lou Piatek won the 1982 Detroit fourth round 3-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 1982* | Detroit | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mary Lou Piatek | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Joanne Russell | Match data |
| Mar 14, 1980* | Boston | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Joanne Russell | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Aug 9, 1979* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Joanne Russell | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Joanne Russell | — | — | — | 1,935 | 203 | 199 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Joanne Russell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 17–12 | 58.6% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,884 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 27–23 | 54.0% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 20–22 | 47.6% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,838 | 0 | 5 |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 5 |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 5 |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 5 |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |