H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 0-2
Judith Wiesner holds a 2–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Judith Wiesner leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1990 US Open first round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1990* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Judith Wiesner | 6-3 6-1 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Mar 11, 1987* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Judith Wiesner | 6-2 6-3 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Judith Wiesner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |