H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Kathleen Cummings H2H: 1-1
Mary Lou Piatek and Kathleen Cummings are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mary Lou Piatek leads 1–0 on grass, while Kathleen Cummings leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Lou Piatek won the 1984 Birmingham second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 1984* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Mary Lou Piatek | 6-3 6-2 | Kathleen Cummings | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1983* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Kathleen Cummings | 7-6 0-6 6-2 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kathleen Cummings | — | — | — | 1,683 | 38 | 50 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Kathleen Cummings | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 9–3 | 75.0% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |