H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Laura Arraya H2H: 0-1
Laura Arraya holds a 1–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1989 Newport third round 6-3 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 1989* | Newport | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Laura Arraya | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |