H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Mary Lou Piatek vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 1-1

Mary Lou Piatek and Lea Antonoplis are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1985 Indianapolis 1 round of 32 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Lou Piatek
USA
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Antonoplis 7-5 7-5 Mary Lou Piatek Match data Mar 7, 1985* R32 Indianapolis 1 WTA 250 Hard
Mary Lou Piatek 6-2 7-5 Lea Antonoplis Match data Jul 31, 1981* R16 San Diego WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mary Lou Piatek — — — 1,931 153 206 42.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,770 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Mary Lou Piatek Lea Antonoplis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0
1979 3–5 37.5% — 1,546 0 0 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0
1980 16–12 57.1% — 1,734 0 0 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0
1981 30–22 57.7% — 1,869 0 1 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0
1982 18–21 46.2% — 1,791 0 1 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0
1983 12–20 37.5% — 1,720 0 1 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,713 0 0
1984 18–20 47.4% — 1,703 0 2 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,722 0 1
1985 14–18 43.8% — 1,677 0 2 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2
1986 8–15 34.8% — 1,618 0 2 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,717 0 2
1987 6–12 33.3% — 1,594 0 2 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,631 0 2
1988 6–16 27.3% — 1,542 0 2 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,567 0 2
1989 7–15 31.8% — 1,592 0 2 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,582 0 2
1990 8–11 42.1% — 1,611 0 2 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,570 0 2
1991 5–8 38.5% — 1,629 0 2 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,458 0 2
1992 1–8 11.1% — 1,559 0 2 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2
1993 1–2 33.3% — 1,554 0 2 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,453 0 2
— — — — — — — 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,446 0 2
— — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,430 0 2

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Mary Lou Piatek Lea Antonoplis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1978 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1979 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
1980 5 3 8 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
1982 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 13 11 24 54.2% 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1983 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3%
1984 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
1985 7 11 18 38.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
1986 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
1987 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5%
1988 4 9 13 30.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
1989 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
1990 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
1991 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1992 0 6 6 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 75 85 160 46.9% 17 32 49 34.7% 12 29 41 29.3% 49 60 109 45.0% Career 45 72 117 38.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Mary Lou Piatek Lea Antonoplis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1978 1499 106.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.12 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55
1979 1547 118.2 — — — — +97 — — 42.1% -0.89 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.14 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36
1980 1735 137.7 — — — — +8 -158 — 55.7% +0.51 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — -0.18 1975 1560 115.7 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.23
1981 1869 146.1 — — — — +63 -192 -295 56.7% +0.48 8–10 (44%) 6–5 (55%) 101.1 -3.04 1976 1610 115.6 — — — — +32 -28 -16 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.98
1982 1792 141.6 — — — — +56 -194 -210 47.1% -0.08 4–5 (44%) 2–3 (40%) 96.7 -0.75 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — -3 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.94
1983 1721 143.7 — — — — +53 -86 — 41.3% -0.43 4–7 (36%) 0–5 (0%) 91.3 -3.81 1978 1713 131.8 — — — — -75 — +41 49.4% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.2 +1.01
1984 1703 128.4 — — — — -13 — -69 47.7% -0.47 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.0 -0.69 1979 1722 130.7 — — — — -96 — +9 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.3 -0.92
1985 1678 113.6 — — — — -29 -65 -67 43.1% -0.61 5–3 (63%) 1–3 (25%) 100.7 +2.10 1980 1733 124.0 — — — — -109 — +62 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +1.51
1986 1618 111.0 — — — — +10 — -24 38.5% -0.67 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.5 +1.60 1981 1717 116.5 — — — — -101 — +95 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.92
1987 1594 117.2 — — — — +33 — — 35.7% -0.78 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.29 1982 1632 114.6 — — — — -131 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 +1.22
1988 1542 116.2 — — — — +33 -43 — 30.8% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — -0.55 1983 1568 97.8 — — — — -36 +18 +127 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.47
1989 1592 121.3 — — — — +35 -116 — 31.4% -1.65 5–2 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 107.3 -2.88 1984 1583 111.0 — — — — -40 — +93 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.39
1990 1611 125.3 — — — — +8 -85 — 43.9% -0.63 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.44 1985 1571 120.1 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.25
1991 1630 119.4 — — — — +17 — — 41.4% -0.31 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.69 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -14 — +163 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.93
1992 1560 101.4 — — — — -16 — — 23.8% -2.00 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — -0.39 1987 1412 91.7 — — — — -6 +46 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.71
1993 1555 103.2 — — — — -22 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 1–0 — -0.16 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.67
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -13 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.78
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21
Career 1932 136.4 — — — — +26 -124 -154 43.9% -0.44 46–55 (46%) 19–34 (36%) 92.3 -2.67 Career 1771 121.5 — — — — -37 +2 +77 44.2% -0.49 43–60 (42%) 33–39 (46%) 95.8 +6.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.