Mary Lou Piatek
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvia Hanika | 5 | 5 | 10 | Mar 31, 1990 | H2H |
| Betsy Nagelsen | 8 | 1 | 9 | Sep 26, 1986 | H2H |
| Anne Smith | 1 | 7 | 8 | Feb 14, 1991 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 8 | 8 | Dec 2, 1984 | H2H |
| Wendy White | 4 | 2 | 6 | Feb 22, 1990 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 1-0
Mary Lou Piatek holds a 1–0 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Lou Piatek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Lou Piatek won the 1988 Dallas round of 32 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | 6-2 6-4 | Lori Mcneil | Match data | Feb 11, 1988* | R32 | Dallas | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,931 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Lori Mcneil | #867 | #9 | 303 | 2,024 | 377 | 273 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Lori Mcneil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,869 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #93 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 3 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 54–24 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,007 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #13 | 1,901 | 0 | 5 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,760 | 0 | 6 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #52 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,870 | 0 | 8 |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #15 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #17 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,804 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #83 | 1,727 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #301 | 1,656 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #91 | 1,718 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #869 | 1,670 | 0 | 11 |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Lori Mcneil | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1978 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1982 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1983 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1980 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 1984 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1981 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1985 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 1982 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 1986 | 20 | 7 | 27 | 74.1% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% |
| 1983 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1987 | 19 | 6 | 25 | 76.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 19 | 8 | 27 | 70.4% |
| 1984 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1988 | 22 | 10 | 32 | 68.8% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 1985 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1989 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 1986 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1990 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 1987 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1991 | 24 | 10 | 34 | 70.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% |
| 1988 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1992 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% |
| 1989 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1993 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 1990 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1994 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 11 | 2 | 13 | 84.6% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 1991 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1995 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% |
| 1992 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 1993 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 75 | 85 | 160 | 46.9% | 17 | 32 | 49 | 34.7% | 12 | 29 | 41 | 29.3% | 49 | 60 | 109 | 45.0% | Career | 160 | 110 | 270 | 59.3% | 39 | 52 | 91 | 42.9% | 99 | 49 | 148 | 66.9% | 77 | 60 | 137 | 56.2% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Lori Mcneil | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1978 | 1499 | 106.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.12 | 1980 | 1485 | 95.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.17 |
| 1979 | 1547 | 118.2 | — | — | — | — | +97 | — | — | 42.1% | -0.89 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.14 | 1981 | 1521 | 104.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 100.0% | +4.50 | — | — | — | +0.24 |
| 1980 | 1735 | 137.7 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -158 | — | 55.7% | +0.51 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–0 | — | -0.18 | 1982 | 1503 | 100.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 42.9% | -0.14 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.35 |
| 1981 | 1869 | 146.1 | — | — | — | — | +63 | -192 | -295 | 56.7% | +0.48 | 8–10 (44%) | 6–5 (55%) | 101.1 | -3.04 | 1983 | 1569 | 107.1 | — | — | — | — | +44 | — | — | 53.8% | +0.19 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–1 | — | +1.06 |
| 1982 | 1792 | 141.6 | — | — | — | — | +56 | -194 | -210 | 47.1% | -0.08 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–3 (40%) | 96.7 | -0.75 | 1984 | 1608 | 115.2 | — | — | — | — | +12 | -54 | +10 | 38.1% | -0.81 | 4–2 (67%) | 1–1 | — | +0.27 |
| 1983 | 1721 | 143.7 | — | — | — | — | +53 | -86 | — | 41.3% | -0.43 | 4–7 (36%) | 0–5 (0%) | 91.3 | -3.81 | 1985 | 1587 | 118.3 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -103 | +5 | 39.2% | -0.85 | 2–5 (29%) | 3–5 (38%) | 96.4 | -0.20 |
| 1984 | 1703 | 128.4 | — | — | — | — | -13 | — | -69 | 47.7% | -0.47 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–3 (57%) | 101.0 | -0.69 | 1986 | 1884 | 144.9 | — | — | — | — | -9 | -341 | -107 | 60.5% | +0.68 | 16–10 (62%) | 12–9 (57%) | 109.2 | +1.49 |
| 1985 | 1678 | 113.6 | — | — | — | — | -29 | -65 | -67 | 43.1% | -0.61 | 5–3 (63%) | 1–3 (25%) | 100.7 | +2.10 | 1987 | 2007 | 158.4 | — | — | — | — | +54 | -355 | -205 | 63.8% | +0.91 | 16–9 (64%) | 12–1 (92%) | 109.8 | -0.78 |
| 1986 | 1618 | 111.0 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | -24 | 38.5% | -0.67 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–3 (0%) | 95.5 | +1.60 | 1988 | 1901 | 142.6 | — | — | — | — | +37 | -185 | +39 | 62.9% | +0.76 | 19–10 (66%) | 8–5 (62%) | 105.0 | +2.06 |
| 1987 | 1594 | 117.2 | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | — | 35.7% | -0.78 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–1 | — | +0.29 | 1989 | 1760 | 134.7 | — | — | — | — | +60 | -78 | +79 | 52.0% | +0.07 | 5–7 (42%) | 5–6 (45%) | 96.3 | -0.23 |
| 1988 | 1542 | 116.2 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -43 | — | 30.8% | -1.31 | 4–4 (50%) | 0–2 | — | -0.55 | 1990 | 1695 | 134.9 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -74 | +200 | 48.2% | -0.08 | 4–9 (31%) | 5–6 (45%) | 90.4 | -0.80 |
| 1989 | 1592 | 121.3 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -116 | — | 31.4% | -1.65 | 5–2 (71%) | 4–2 (67%) | 107.3 | -2.88 | 1991 | 1870 | 151.0 | — | — | — | — | +12 | -241 | +42 | 60.4% | +0.77 | 13–6 (68%) | 9–10 (47%) | 104.2 | -0.74 |
| 1990 | 1611 | 125.3 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -85 | — | 43.9% | -0.63 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.44 | 1992 | 1962 | 156.8 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -303 | +76 | 63.6% | +0.94 | 8–10 (44%) | 10–9 (53%) | 96.7 | -0.46 |
| 1991 | 1630 | 119.4 | — | — | — | — | +17 | — | — | 41.4% | -0.31 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.69 | 1993 | 1899 | 147.7 | — | — | — | — | -6 | -291 | +192 | 58.1% | +0.61 | 6–7 (46%) | 3–9 (25%) | 95.3 | -0.38 |
| 1992 | 1560 | 101.4 | — | — | — | — | -16 | — | — | 23.8% | -2.00 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–2 | — | -0.39 | 1994 | 1871 | 145.9 | — | — | — | — | -58 | -207 | +244 | 61.1% | +0.69 | 7–8 (47%) | 7–5 (58%) | 98.9 | -0.52 |
| 1993 | 1555 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | -22 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.71 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.16 | 1995 | 1805 | 142.2 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -206 | +304 | 53.8% | +0.38 | 5–12 (29%) | 4–8 (33%) | 91.4 | -0.26 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1727 | 130.2 | — | — | — | — | -12 | — | +384 | 36.5% | -0.65 | 5–3 (63%) | 2–7 (22%) | 96.5 | -0.48 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1656 | 120.2 | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | — | 22.2% | -1.61 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | -1.12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1719 | 129.4 | — | — | — | — | +1 | -154 | +315 | 51.4% | +0.09 | 5–2 (71%) | 0–2 | — | -0.58 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1671 | 99.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -0.80 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.18 |
| Career | 1932 | 136.4 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -124 | -154 | 43.9% | -0.44 | 46–55 (46%) | 19–34 (36%) | 92.3 | -2.67 | Career | 2025 | 149.2 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -212 | +86 | 56.0% | +0.41 | 117–106 (52%) | 81–87 (48%) | 98.3 | -0.11 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Lori Mcneil
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zina Garrison | 8 | 6 | 14 | Jun 18, 1995 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 2 | 11 | 13 | Oct 20, 1995 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 12 | 12 | Oct 14, 1994 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 2 | 8 | 10 | Nov 12, 1995 | H2H |
| Larisa Savchenko | 7 | 2 | 9 | Jul 1, 1994 | H2H |