H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 1-0
Mary Lou Piatek holds a 1–0 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Lou Piatek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Lou Piatek won the 1988 Dallas third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 1988* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mary Lou Piatek | 6-2 6-4 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Lori Mcneil | #867 | #9 | 303 | 2,032 | 377 | 273 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Lori Mcneil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #93 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 3 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 54–24 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,017 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #13 | 1,904 | 0 | 5 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,760 | 0 | 6 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 6 |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,870 | 0 | 8 |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #15 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #17 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,804 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #83 | 1,726 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #301 | 1,655 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #91 | 1,717 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #869 | 1,669 | 0 | 11 |