H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Manuela Maleeva Fragniere H2H: 0-2
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 2–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1988 Dallas quarterfinal 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1988* | Dallas | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-2 6-1 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Feb 3, 1984* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-0 7-5 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | #5 | #3 | 148 | 2,128 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 19 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 50–16 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,098 | 0 | 5 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,073 | 0 | 6 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,111 | 0 | 8 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,091 | 0 | 10 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 2,016 | 0 | 12 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #9 | 2,067 | 0 | 12 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #10 | 2,027 | 0 | 15 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,994 | 0 | 16 |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,045 | 0 | 18 |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 12–2 | 85.7% | #5 | 2,066 | 0 | 19 |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |