H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 1-1
Mary Lou Piatek and Mercedes Paz are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Lou Piatek won the 1993 Oklahoma third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 1993* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mary Lou Piatek | 6-2 6-3 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
| Nov 16, 1991* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Mercedes Paz | 6-4 6-3 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Mercedes Paz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |