H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 0-1
Nathalie Herreman holds a 1–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Herreman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1984 Nashville fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 60
Left-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 1984* | Nashville | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Nathalie Herreman | 6-1 6-2 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nathalie Herreman | #886 | #42 | 20 | 1,728 | 103 | 154 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Nathalie Herreman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #91 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #121 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #183 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |