H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Patty Fendick H2H: 0-4
Patty Fendick holds a 4–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Patty Fendick leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1989 San Antonio fourth round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 1989* | San Antonio | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Patty Fendick | 6-3 6-1 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Feb 24, 1989* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Patty Fendick | 6-2 6-3 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Mar 4, 1988* | San Antonio | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Patty Fendick | 7-5 6-3 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1986* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Patty Fendick | 6-0 6-3 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Patty Fendick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |