H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Pilar Vasquez H2H: 1-0
Mary Lou Piatek holds a 1–0 lead over Pilar Vasquez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Lou Piatek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Lou Piatek won the 1989 San Antonio third round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1989* | San Antonio | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mary Lou Piatek | 7-6 6-2 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,786 | 96 | 133 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Pilar Vasquez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 17–3 | 85.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,420 | 0 | 4 |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |