H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Sara Gomer H2H: 1-0
Mary Lou Piatek holds a 1–0 lead over Sara Gomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Lou Piatek leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mary Lou Piatek won the 1985 Denver fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 1985* | Denver | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mary Lou Piatek | 6-3 6-3 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Sara Gomer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |