H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Sherry Acker H2H: 4-0
Mary Lou Piatek holds a 4–0 lead over Sherry Acker in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mary Lou Piatek leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Lou Piatek won the 1983 US Open first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1983* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mary Lou Piatek | 6-4 6-4 | Sherry Acker | Match data |
| Apr 28, 1983* | Atlanta | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mary Lou Piatek | 6-0 3-6 6-0 | Sherry Acker | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1980* | Richmond | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mary Lou Piatek | 6-2 6-3 | Sherry Acker | Match data |
| Feb 1, 1979* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mary Lou Piatek | 6-4 6-7 6-3 | Sherry Acker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sherry Acker | — | — | — | 1,840 | 63 | 100 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Sherry Acker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 29–31 | 48.3% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |