Mary Lou Piatek
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvia Hanika | 5 | 5 | 10 | Mar 31, 1990 | H2H |
| Betsy Nagelsen | 8 | 1 | 9 | Sep 26, 1986 | H2H |
| Anne Smith | 1 | 7 | 8 | Feb 14, 1991 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 8 | 8 | Dec 2, 1984 | H2H |
| Wendy White | 4 | 2 | 6 | Feb 22, 1990 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC
Silke Meier holds a 1–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Silke Meier leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Silke Meier won the 1987 Wimbledon round of 128 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silke Meier | 6-2 6-2 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data | Jun 24, 1987* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,938 | 157 | 207 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Silke Meier | — | #40 | 101 | 1,667 | 81 | 141 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Silke Meier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #132 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #138 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #80 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #151 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #113 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #205 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Silke Meier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1978 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1979 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1986 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 1980 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 1987 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 1981 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1988 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 1982 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 1989 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1990 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1984 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 1985 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1992 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 1986 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1993 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 1987 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1994 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 1988 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1995 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1996 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1997 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 75 | 85 | 160 | 46.9% | 17 | 32 | 49 | 34.7% | 12 | 29 | 41 | 29.3% | 53 | 61 | 114 | 46.5% | Career | 19 | 33 | 52 | 36.5% | 47 | 76 | 123 | 38.2% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 10 | 24 | 34 | 29.4% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Silke Meier | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1978 | 1499 | 106.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.11 | 1985 | 1512 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 46.2% | +0.15 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.29 |
| 1979 | 1547 | 118.3 | — | — | — | — | +98 | — | — | 42.1% | -0.89 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.12 | 1986 | 1594 | 114.1 | — | — | — | — | +37 | -79 | — | 49.0% | +0.08 | 5–4 (56%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +2.07 |
| 1980 | 1763 | 137.4 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -186 | — | 57.7% | +0.61 | 4–3 (57%) | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.65 | 1987 | 1592 | 118.2 | — | — | — | — | +66 | -86 | — | 44.4% | -0.61 | 6–4 (60%) | 2–0 | — | +0.77 |
| 1981 | 1875 | 146.3 | — | — | — | — | +65 | -198 | -301 | 56.7% | +0.48 | 8–10 (44%) | 6–5 (55%) | 100.9 | -2.75 | 1988 | 1590 | 121.7 | — | — | — | — | -65 | +4 | — | 36.5% | -1.14 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.88 |
| 1982 | 1794 | 142.2 | — | — | — | — | +59 | -196 | -212 | 47.1% | -0.08 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–3 (40%) | 96.6 | -0.89 | 1989 | 1554 | 105.5 | — | — | — | — | -82 | +43 | — | 38.5% | -0.92 | 4–6 (40%) | 2–4 (33%) | 96.0 | +1.00 |
| 1983 | 1722 | 143.9 | — | — | — | — | +55 | -87 | — | 41.3% | -0.43 | 4–7 (36%) | 0–5 (0%) | 91.3 | -4.11 | 1990 | 1529 | 108.7 | — | — | — | — | -26 | -7 | — | 30.8% | -1.31 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | 96.9 | -0.10 |
| 1984 | 1704 | 128.6 | — | — | — | — | -14 | — | -70 | 47.7% | -0.47 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–3 (57%) | 100.9 | -0.88 | 1991 | 1511 | 102.1 | — | — | — | — | -36 | +3 | — | 31.3% | -1.13 | 4–2 (67%) | 0–2 | — | +0.55 |
| 1985 | 1678 | 113.9 | — | — | — | — | -28 | -65 | -67 | 43.1% | -0.61 | 5–3 (63%) | 1–3 (25%) | 100.7 | +1.98 | 1992 | 1585 | 122.9 | — | — | — | — | -101 | +40 | — | 45.6% | -0.18 | 5–6 (45%) | 1–1 | — | +1.05 |
| 1986 | 1619 | 111.1 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | -25 | 38.5% | -0.67 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–3 (0%) | 95.5 | +1.45 | 1993 | 1521 | 105.5 | — | — | — | — | -12 | +4 | — | 31.4% | -1.53 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–4 (50%) | 100.0 | +0.19 |
| 1987 | 1595 | 117.3 | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | — | 35.7% | -0.78 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–1 | — | +0.12 | 1994 | 1528 | 101.6 | — | — | — | — | -52 | +33 | — | 34.5% | -1.14 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.23 |
| 1988 | 1543 | 116.2 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -44 | — | 30.8% | -1.31 | 4–4 (50%) | 0–2 | — | -0.58 | 1995 | 1534 | 112.5 | — | — | — | — | -61 | +42 | — | 42.4% | -0.52 | 6–5 (55%) | 1–3 (25%) | 101.7 | +1.06 |
| 1989 | 1593 | 121.4 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -117 | — | 31.4% | -1.65 | 5–2 (71%) | 4–2 (67%) | 107.3 | -2.73 | 1996 | 1488 | 107.5 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -8 | — | 21.4% | -2.00 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–1 | — | -0.31 |
| 1990 | 1612 | 125.3 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -86 | — | 43.9% | -0.63 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.44 | 1997 | 1482 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.14 |
| 1991 | 1630 | 119.5 | — | — | — | — | +17 | — | — | 41.4% | -0.31 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1560 | 101.4 | — | — | — | — | -16 | — | — | 23.8% | -2.00 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–2 | — | -0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1555 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | -21 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.71 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1938 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -129 | -156 | 44.3% | -0.42 | 47–56 (46%) | 21–34 (38%) | 92.7 | -2.59 | Career | 1667 | 116.1 | — | — | — | — | -20 | +5 | — | 38.4% | -0.83 | 41–38 (52%) | 15–23 (39%) | 102.4 | +2.60 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvia Hanika | 5 | 5 | 10 | Mar 31, 1990 | H2H |
| Betsy Nagelsen | 8 | 1 | 9 | Sep 26, 1986 | H2H |
| Anne Smith | 1 | 7 | 8 | Feb 14, 1991 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 8 | 8 | Dec 2, 1984 | H2H |
| Wendy White | 4 | 2 | 6 | Feb 22, 1990 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Cecchini | 1 | 4 | 5 | Apr 28, 1995 | H2H |
| Kimiko Date | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 30, 1995 | H2H |
| Lori Mcneil | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 20, 1995 | H2H |
| Barbara Schett | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 17, 1997 | H2H |
| Irina Spirlea | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 18, 1996 | H2H |