H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Sophie Amiach H2H: 2-0
Mary Lou Piatek holds a 2–0 lead over Sophie Amiach in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mary Lou Piatek leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Lou Piatek won the 1984 Denver semifinal 7-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 1984* | Denver | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Mary Lou Piatek | 7-6 7-5 | Sophie Amiach | Match data |
| Nov 19, 1981* | Perth 2 | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Mary Lou Piatek | 6-4 6-1 | Sophie Amiach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sophie Amiach | #577 | #57 | 9 | 1,649 | 57 | 93 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Sophie Amiach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 10–5 | 66.7% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #173 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #129 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #227 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #243 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #199 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #446 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |