H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Stephanie Rehe H2H: 0-2
Stephanie Rehe holds a 2–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Stephanie Rehe leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stephanie Rehe won the 1988 Indianapolis fourth round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 1988* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Stephanie Rehe | 6-1 6-4 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Nov 8, 1985* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Stephanie Rehe | 7-5 6-2 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Stephanie Rehe | #156 | #10 | 60 | 2,000 | 134 | 98 | 57.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Stephanie Rehe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #182 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #19 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 17–8 | 68.0% | #28 | 1,868 | 0 | 3 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,968 | 0 | 5 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #123 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #74 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |