H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Susan Mascarin H2H: 2-1
Mary Lou Piatek holds a 2–1 lead over Susan Mascarin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Lou Piatek leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Susan Mascarin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Lou Piatek won the 1987 Little Rock third round 6-2 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1987* | Little Rock | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mary Lou Piatek | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | Susan Mascarin | Match data |
| Sep 26, 1981* | Atlanta | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Mary Lou Piatek | 6-1 6-3 | Susan Mascarin | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1981* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Susan Mascarin | 6-4 5-7 6-1 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Susan Mascarin | #460 | #32 | 14 | 1,796 | 113 | 142 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Susan Mascarin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 9–24 | 27.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #69 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #118 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #221 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |