H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mary Lou Piatek vs Tracy Austin H2H: 0-3
Tracy Austin holds a 3–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tracy Austin leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tracy Austin won the 1981 Atlanta final 4-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 1981* | Atlanta | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Tracy Austin | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Jan 31, 1980* | Seattle | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Tracy Austin | 6-0 6-1 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
| Feb 2, 1979* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Tracy Austin | 6-0 6-2 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Tracy Austin | #81 | #4 | 19 | 2,484 | 339 | 88 | 79.4% | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 28 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Tracy Austin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 43–13 | 76.8% | — | 2,055 | 0 | 2 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 73–12 | 85.9% | — | 2,412 | 1 | 9 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 81–10 | 89.0% | — | 2,383 | 1 | 19 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 56–7 | 88.9% | — | 2,406 | 2 | 27 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 35–12 | 74.5% | — | 2,224 | 2 | 28 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 24–8 | 75.0% | — | 2,162 | 2 | 28 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #27 | 2,115 | 2 | 28 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 2,057 | 2 | 28 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #117 | 1,955 | 2 | 28 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,840 | 2 | 28 |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |