H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Mary Lou Piatek vs Zina Garrison H2H: 0-4

Zina Garrison holds a 4–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 3–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1990 Oakland fourth round 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Lou Piatek
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Zina Garrison
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 2, 1990* Oakland WTA 250 R16 Carpet Zina Garrison #8 6-2 7-5 Mary Lou Piatek Match data
Feb 13, 1989 Washington WTA 250 R16 Hard Zina Garrison #9 6-2 6-0 Mary Lou Piatek Match data
Nov 13, 1987* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Zina Garrison #9 6-1 6-0 Mary Lou Piatek Match data
Mar 14, 1985* Dallas WTA 250 R32 Carpet Zina Garrison #7 7-5 6-4 Mary Lou Piatek Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Lou Piatek — — — 1,936 153 206 42.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Mary Lou Piatek Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
1979 3–5 37.5% — 1,546 0 0 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,568 0 1
1980 16–12 57.1% — 1,737 0 0 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,853 0 1
1981 30–22 57.7% — 1,873 0 1 1983 38–18 67.9% — 1,989 0 1
1982 18–21 46.2% — 1,792 0 1 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
1983 12–20 37.5% — 1,721 0 1 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4
1984 18–20 47.4% — 1,703 0 2 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5
1985 14–18 43.8% — 1,678 0 2 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7
1986 8–15 34.8% — 1,619 0 2 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7
1987 6–12 33.3% — 1,594 0 2 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10
1988 6–16 27.3% — 1,542 0 2 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11
1989 7–15 31.8% — 1,593 0 2 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
1990 8–11 42.1% — 1,612 0 2 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12
1991 5–8 38.5% — 1,630 0 2 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
1992 1–8 11.1% — 1,560 0 2 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14
1993 1–2 33.3% — 1,555 0 2 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
— — — — — — — 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15