Mary Lou Piatek
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvia Hanika | 5 | 5 | 10 | Mar 31, 1990 | H2H |
| Betsy Nagelsen | 8 | 1 | 9 | Sep 26, 1986 | H2H |
| Anne Smith | 1 | 7 | 8 | Feb 14, 1991 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 8 | 8 | Dec 2, 1984 | H2H |
| Wendy White | 4 | 2 | 6 | Feb 22, 1990 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Zina Garrison holds a 4–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 3–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1990 Oakland round of 16 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zina Garrison | 6-2 7-5 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data | Nov 2, 1990* | R16 | Oakland | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Carpet |
| Zina Garrison | 6-2 6-0 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data | Feb 13, 1989 | R16 | Washington Open | WTA 250 | Hard |
| Zina Garrison | 6-1 6-0 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data | Nov 13, 1987* | R16 | Chicago | WTA 250 | Carpet |
| Zina Garrison | 7-5 6-4 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data | Mar 14, 1985* | R32 | Dallas | WTA 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,931 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,146 | 584 | 270 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 15 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Zina Garrison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,869 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #10 | 1,990 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,033 | 0 | 4 |
| 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 2,000 | 0 | 5 |
| 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,988 | 0 | 7 |
| 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 52–21 | 71.2% | #9 | 2,043 | 0 | 7 |
| 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,135 | 0 | 10 |
| 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,041 | 0 | 11 |
| 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 |
| 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 1,915 | 0 | 12 |
| 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 |
| 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,888 | 0 | 14 |
| 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,711 | 0 | 15 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Zina Garrison | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1978 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1980 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1979 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 1980 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 1982 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 1981 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1983 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% |
| 1982 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 1984 | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% |
| 1983 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1985 | 14 | 3 | 17 | 82.4% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% |
| 1984 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1986 | 21 | 5 | 26 | 80.8% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% |
| 1985 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1987 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% |
| 1986 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1988 | 28 | 10 | 38 | 73.7% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 1987 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1989 | 30 | 6 | 36 | 83.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | 15 | 4 | 19 | 78.9% |
| 1988 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1990 | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% |
| 1989 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1991 | 18 | 8 | 26 | 69.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% |
| 1990 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1992 | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% |
| 1991 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1993 | 22 | 8 | 30 | 73.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% |
| 1992 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 1993 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| Career | 75 | 85 | 160 | 46.9% | 17 | 32 | 49 | 34.7% | 12 | 29 | 41 | 29.3% | 49 | 60 | 109 | 45.0% | Career | 225 | 86 | 311 | 72.3% | 90 | 58 | 148 | 60.8% | 123 | 41 | 164 | 75.0% | 142 | 83 | 225 | 63.1% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Mary Lou Piatek | Zina Garrison | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1978 | 1499 | 106.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.12 | 1980 | 1529 | 117.3 | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | — | 55.6% | +0.56 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.25 |
| 1979 | 1547 | 118.2 | — | — | — | — | +97 | — | — | 42.1% | -0.89 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.14 | 1981 | 1570 | 122.3 | — | — | — | — | +74 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.55 | 2–2 (50%) | — | — | +1.08 |
| 1980 | 1735 | 137.7 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -158 | — | 55.7% | +0.51 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–0 | — | -0.18 | 1982 | 1854 | 155.0 | — | — | — | — | -185 | -170 | -50 | 57.5% | +0.46 | 7–4 (64%) | 4–3 (57%) | 108.3 | -5.41 |
| 1981 | 1869 | 146.1 | — | — | — | — | +63 | -192 | -295 | 56.7% | +0.48 | 8–10 (44%) | 6–5 (55%) | 101.1 | -3.04 | 1983 | 1991 | 154.6 | — | — | — | — | -125 | -109 | -50 | 65.0% | +0.87 | 7–2 (78%) | 7–6 (54%) | 108.1 | -2.31 |
| 1982 | 1792 | 141.6 | — | — | — | — | +56 | -194 | -210 | 47.1% | -0.08 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–3 (40%) | 96.7 | -0.75 | 1984 | 2013 | 157.3 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -96 | -60 | 65.1% | +1.21 | 12–7 (63%) | 7–2 (78%) | 105.1 | +0.09 |
| 1983 | 1721 | 143.7 | — | — | — | — | +53 | -86 | — | 41.3% | -0.43 | 4–7 (36%) | 0–5 (0%) | 91.3 | -3.81 | 1985 | 2033 | 160.2 | — | — | — | — | +49 | -57 | -42 | 67.7% | +1.56 | 15–5 (75%) | 4–11 (27%) | 96.5 | +1.14 |
| 1984 | 1703 | 128.4 | — | — | — | — | -13 | — | -69 | 47.7% | -0.47 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–3 (57%) | 101.0 | -0.69 | 1986 | 2001 | 159.2 | — | — | — | — | +95 | -126 | -21 | 66.0% | +1.22 | 10–7 (59%) | 8–6 (57%) | 98.3 | -1.84 |
| 1985 | 1678 | 113.6 | — | — | — | — | -29 | -65 | -67 | 43.1% | -0.61 | 5–3 (63%) | 1–3 (25%) | 100.7 | +2.10 | 1987 | 1988 | 166.8 | — | — | — | — | +36 | -60 | +137 | 69.6% | +1.50 | 7–6 (54%) | 6–4 (60%) | 100.4 | -2.77 |
| 1986 | 1618 | 111.0 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | -24 | 38.5% | -0.67 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–3 (0%) | 95.5 | +1.60 | 1988 | 2043 | 162.0 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -89 | +75 | 68.1% | +1.43 | 9–7 (56%) | 7–3 (70%) | 101.1 | -4.39 |
| 1987 | 1594 | 117.2 | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | — | 35.7% | -0.78 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–1 | — | +0.29 | 1989 | 2135 | 170.0 | — | — | — | — | +59 | -212 | -20 | 76.4% | +2.14 | 8–7 (53%) | 10–3 (77%) | 101.5 | -0.28 |
| 1988 | 1542 | 116.2 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -43 | — | 30.8% | -1.31 | 4–4 (50%) | 0–2 | — | -0.55 | 1990 | 2041 | 161.7 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -144 | +213 | 68.5% | +1.50 | 11–10 (52%) | 4–5 (44%) | 95.8 | -1.68 |
| 1989 | 1592 | 121.3 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -116 | — | 31.4% | -1.65 | 5–2 (71%) | 4–2 (67%) | 107.3 | -2.88 | 1991 | 1964 | 153.9 | — | — | — | — | +30 | -134 | +240 | 63.1% | +0.89 | 9–5 (64%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.7 | +1.03 |
| 1990 | 1611 | 125.3 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -85 | — | 43.9% | -0.63 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.44 | 1992 | 1915 | 157.8 | — | — | — | — | +39 | -53 | +312 | 62.5% | +0.84 | 9–7 (56%) | 5–3 (63%) | 97.2 | +0.17 |
| 1991 | 1630 | 119.4 | — | — | — | — | +17 | — | — | 41.4% | -0.31 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.69 | 1993 | 1996 | 160.6 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -217 | +199 | 67.4% | +1.23 | 8–7 (53%) | 8–4 (67%) | 100.2 | +0.22 |
| 1992 | 1560 | 101.4 | — | — | — | — | -16 | — | — | 23.8% | -2.00 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–2 | — | -0.39 | 1994 | 1889 | 145.3 | — | — | — | — | +24 | -186 | +259 | 54.3% | +0.13 | 10–4 (71%) | 7–2 (78%) | 102.6 | -0.25 |
| 1993 | 1555 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | -22 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.71 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.16 | 1995 | 1868 | 147.9 | — | — | — | — | +29 | -240 | +311 | 61.2% | +0.83 | 6–10 (38%) | 5–3 (63%) | 91.6 | +1.45 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1712 | 111.8 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | — | 20.8% | -1.50 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–1 | — | +0.20 |
| Career | 1932 | 136.4 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -124 | -154 | 43.9% | -0.44 | 46–55 (46%) | 19–34 (36%) | 92.3 | -2.67 | Career | 2146 | 164.6 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -112 | +91 | 65.2% | +1.16 | 131–94 (58%) | 86–59 (59%) | 101.4 | -1.56 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvia Hanika | 5 | 5 | 10 | Mar 31, 1990 | H2H |
| Betsy Nagelsen | 8 | 1 | 9 | Sep 26, 1986 | H2H |
| Anne Smith | 1 | 7 | 8 | Feb 14, 1991 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 8 | 8 | Dec 2, 1984 | H2H |
| Wendy White | 4 | 2 | 6 | Feb 22, 1990 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Navratilova | 1 | 33 | 34 | Nov 7, 1993 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 8 | 8 | 16 | Jun 12, 1993 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 2 | 12 | 14 | Nov 11, 1995 | H2H |
| Lori Mcneil | 6 | 8 | 14 | Jun 18, 1995 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 10 | 3 | 13 | Nov 14, 1996 | H2H |