H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Mary Lou Piatek vs Zina Garrison H2H: 0-4

Zina Garrison holds a 4–0 lead over Mary Lou Piatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 3–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1990 Oakland round of 16 6-2 7-5.

H2H
0 – 4
4 main-draw meetings
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Zina Garrison #8 6-2 7-5 Mary Lou Piatek Match data Nov 2, 1990* R16 Oakland Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Zina Garrison #9 6-2 6-0 Mary Lou Piatek Match data Feb 17, 1989* R16 Washington Open WTA 500 Hard
Zina Garrison #9 6-1 6-0 Mary Lou Piatek Match data Nov 13, 1987* R16 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Zina Garrison #7 7-5 6-4 Mary Lou Piatek Match data Mar 14, 1985* R32 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mary Lou Piatek — — — 1,938 157 207 43.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Zina Garrison — #4 134 2,146 584 270 68.4% 0 0 0 2 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Mary Lou Piatek Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0 1980 2–2 50.0% — 1,529 0 1
1979 3–5 37.5% — 1,547 0 0 1981 5–5 50.0% — 1,569 0 1
1980 20–13 60.6% — 1,762 0 0 1982 23–15 60.5% — 1,854 0 1
1981 30–22 57.7% — 1,874 0 1 1983 38–18 67.9% #10 1,991 0 1
1982 18–21 46.2% — 1,793 0 1 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,013 0 2
1983 12–20 37.5% — 1,721 0 1 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,033 0 4
1984 18–20 47.4% — 1,704 0 2 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 2,000 0 5
1985 14–18 43.8% — 1,678 0 2 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,988 0 7
1986 8–15 34.8% — 1,618 0 2 1988 52–21 71.2% #9 2,043 0 7
1987 6–12 33.3% — 1,594 0 2 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,135 0 10
1988 6–16 27.3% — 1,542 0 2 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,041 0 11
1989 7–15 31.8% — 1,592 0 2 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,964 0 11
1990 8–11 42.1% — 1,611 0 2 1992 36–20 64.3% #18 1,915 0 12
1991 5–8 38.5% — 1,629 0 2 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
1992 1–8 11.1% — 1,560 0 2 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14
1993 1–2 33.3% — 1,554 0 2 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
— — — — — — — 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,711 0 15

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Mary Lou Piatek Zina Garrison
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1978 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
1979 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
1980 5 3 8 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 5 18 72.2% 8 5 13 61.5%
1982 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 13 11 24 54.2% 1984 11 3 14 78.6% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 15 6 21 71.4%
1983 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 14 7 21 66.7%
1984 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1986 21 5 26 80.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5%
1985 7 11 18 38.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1987 15 5 20 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 13 7 20 65.0%
1986 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 1988 28 10 38 73.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
1987 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1989 30 6 36 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 15 4 19 78.9%
1988 4 9 13 30.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 18 6 24 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 12 6 18 66.7%
1989 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 18 8 26 69.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 10 5 15 66.7%
1990 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 18 6 24 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 7 15 53.3%
1991 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 22 8 30 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 12 5 17 70.6%
1992 0 6 6 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 4 12 66.7%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
Career 75 85 160 46.9% 17 32 49 34.7% 12 29 41 29.3% 53 61 114 46.5% Career 225 86 311 72.3% 90 58 148 60.8% 123 41 164 75.0% 142 83 225 63.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Mary Lou Piatek Zina Garrison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1978 1499 106.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11 1980 1530 117.5 — — — — +50 — — 55.6% +0.56 0–1 — — +0.24
1979 1547 118.3 — — — — +98 — — 42.1% -0.89 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.12 1981 1570 122.6 — — — — +75 — — 54.5% +0.55 2–2 (50%) — — +1.07
1980 1763 137.4 — — — — +9 -186 — 57.7% +0.61 4–3 (57%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.65 1982 1854 155.2 — — — — -184 -169 -50 57.5% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -4.44
1981 1875 146.3 — — — — +65 -198 -301 56.7% +0.48 8–10 (44%) 6–5 (55%) 100.9 -2.75 1983 1992 154.7 — — — — -125 -109 -51 65.0% +0.87 7–2 (78%) 7–6 (54%) 108.1 -2.42
1982 1794 142.2 — — — — +59 -196 -212 47.1% -0.08 4–5 (44%) 2–3 (40%) 96.6 -0.89 1984 2014 157.4 — — — — +14 -97 -60 65.1% +1.21 12–7 (63%) 7–2 (78%) 105.1 -0.88
1983 1722 143.9 — — — — +55 -87 — 41.3% -0.43 4–7 (36%) 0–5 (0%) 91.3 -4.11 1985 2034 160.3 — — — — +48 -57 -43 67.7% +1.56 15–5 (75%) 4–11 (27%) 96.5 +0.81
1984 1704 128.6 — — — — -14 — -70 47.7% -0.47 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 100.9 -0.88 1986 2001 159.4 — — — — +95 -126 -22 66.0% +1.22 10–7 (59%) 8–6 (57%) 98.3 -1.14
1985 1678 113.9 — — — — -28 -65 -67 43.1% -0.61 5–3 (63%) 1–3 (25%) 100.7 +1.98 1987 1989 166.9 — — — — +36 -61 +137 69.6% +1.50 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 100.4 -2.84
1986 1619 111.1 — — — — +10 — -25 38.5% -0.67 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.5 +1.45 1988 2044 162.1 — — — — +19 -90 +74 68.1% +1.43 9–7 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -4.42
1987 1595 117.3 — — — — +33 — — 35.7% -0.78 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.12 1989 2136 170.0 — — — — +58 -213 -22 76.4% +2.14 8–7 (53%) 10–3 (77%) 101.5 -0.27
1988 1543 116.2 — — — — +33 -44 — 30.8% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — -0.58 1990 2042 161.7 — — — — +13 -145 +212 68.5% +1.50 11–10 (52%) 4–5 (44%) 95.8 -1.68
1989 1593 121.4 — — — — +35 -117 — 31.4% -1.65 5–2 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 107.3 -2.73 1991 1964 154.0 — — — — +29 -134 +240 63.1% +0.89 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.7 +1.03
1990 1612 125.3 — — — — +7 -86 — 43.9% -0.63 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.44 1992 1915 157.8 — — — — +40 -53 +313 62.5% +0.84 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 97.2 +0.17
1991 1630 119.5 — — — — +17 — — 41.4% -0.31 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.69 1993 1996 160.6 — — — — +23 -216 +200 67.4% +1.23 8–7 (53%) 8–4 (67%) 100.2 +0.21
1992 1560 101.4 — — — — -16 — — 23.8% -2.00 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — -0.39 1994 1889 145.4 — — — — +24 -186 +260 54.3% +0.13 10–4 (71%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -0.25
1993 1555 103.2 — — — — -21 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 1–0 — -0.16 1995 1869 147.9 — — — — +28 -240 +310 61.2% +0.83 6–10 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 91.6 +1.45
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1712 111.9 — — — — +24 — — 20.8% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.20
Career 1938 136.6 — — — — +26 -129 -156 44.3% -0.42 47–56 (46%) 21–34 (38%) 92.7 -2.59 Career 2147 164.7 — — — — +27 -112 +90 65.2% +1.16 131–94 (58%) 86–59 (59%) 101.4 -1.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.