H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mary Pierce vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 8-2
Mary Pierce holds a 8–2 lead over Amanda Coetzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 3–2 on hard courts and 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2003 Charleston fourth round 6-3 1-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
8
–
2
10 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
158 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2003* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Mary Pierce | 6-3 1-6 6-0 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1999* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 6-1 4-2 (ret.) | Mary Pierce | Match data |
| Nov 16, 1998 | WTA Tour Championships | WTA Finals | R16 | Carpet | Mary Pierce | 6-1 6-0 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
| Oct 8, 1998* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mary Pierce | 6-2 6-2 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
| May 17, 1997* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | SF | Clay | Mary Pierce | 6-4 6-4 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
| Jan 26, 1997* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | SF | Hard | Mary Pierce | 7-5 6-1 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
| Sep 24, 1995* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Mary Pierce | 6-0 6-2 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
| Aug 19, 1995* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 6-4 5-7 6-0 | Mary Pierce | Match data |
| Nov 14, 1994 | Virginia Slims Championships | WTA Finals | R16 | Carpet | Mary Pierce | 5-7 6-3 6-3 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
| May 31, 1994* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Mary Pierce | 6-1 6-1 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,137 | 460 | 215 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
| Amanda Coetzer | #289 | #3 | 3,380 | 2,051 | 491 | 307 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Pierce | Amanda Coetzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1992 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #13 | 1,901 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #63 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 7 | 1992 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #17 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,899 | 1 | 7 | 1993 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #15 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,053 | 1 | 8 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #18 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,120 | 1 | 12 | 1995 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 | 1996 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,033 | 2 | 15 | 1997 | 60–25 | 70.6% | #4 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,839 | 2 | 15 | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,887 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,752 | 2 | 15 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #11 | 1,815 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 | 2000 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2004 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,754 | 2 | 16 | 2001 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,119 | 2 | 18 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,967 | 2 | 18 | 2003 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,738 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #286 | 1,718 | 0 | 9 |