H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 8-2

Mary Pierce holds a 8–2 lead over Amanda Coetzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 3–2 on hard courts and 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2003 Charleston fourth round 6-3 1-6 6-0.

FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
8 2
10 main draw meetings
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 11, 2003* Charleston WTA 1000 R16 Clay Mary Pierce #43 6-3 1-6 6-0 Amanda Coetzer #18 Match data
Mar 22, 1999* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R16 Hard Amanda Coetzer #9 6-1 4-2 (ret.) Mary Pierce #8 Match data
Nov 16, 1998 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Mary Pierce #7 6-1 6-0 Amanda Coetzer #16 Match data
Oct 8, 1998* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Hard Mary Pierce #11 6-2 6-2 Amanda Coetzer #10 Match data
May 17, 1997* Berlin WTA 1000 SF Clay Mary Pierce #11 6-4 6-4 Amanda Coetzer #10 Match data
Jan 26, 1997* Australian Open Grand Slam SF Hard Mary Pierce #22 7-5 6-1 Amanda Coetzer #14 Match data
Sep 24, 1995* Tokyo WTA 500 SF Hard Mary Pierce #5 6-0 6-2 Amanda Coetzer #23 Match data
Aug 19, 1995* Canadian Open WTA 1000 QF Hard Amanda Coetzer #27 6-4 5-7 6-0 Mary Pierce #5 Match data
Nov 14, 1994 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Mary Pierce #5 5-7 6-3 6-3 Amanda Coetzer #17 Match data
May 31, 1994* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Mary Pierce #12 6-1 6-1 Amanda Coetzer #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,051 491 307 61.5% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,675 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,686 0 0
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1992 35–15 70.0% #17 1,857 0 0
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,991 0 2
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,885 0 3
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,910 0 3
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1996 31–20 60.8% #14 1,863 0 3
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,013 0 5
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,815 0 6
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 2000 44–22 66.7% #12 1,892 0 7
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,795 0 8
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9