H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 2-1

Mary Pierce holds a 2–1 lead over Andrea Temesvari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1994 US Open first round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Andrea Temesvari
HUN Age 60 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 31, 1994* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Mary Pierce #5 6-3 6-2 Andrea Temesvari #127 Match data
Aug 15, 1990* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R64 Hard Mary Pierce #139 6-0 6-2 Andrea Temesvari #63 Match data
Apr 27, 1989* Houston WTA 250 R32 Clay Andrea Temesvari #111 6-2 6-3 Mary Pierce Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Andrea Temesvari #932 #7 109 2,021 185 178 51.0% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Andrea Temesvari
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 1981 11–6 64.7% — 1,626 0 1
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1982 18–14 56.2% — 1,772 0 1
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1983 42–15 73.7% — 1,988 0 4
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1984 24–16 60.0% #14 1,888 0 4
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1985 18–12 60.0% #16 1,847 0 5
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1986 11–12 47.8% #43 1,787 0 5
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1987 1–2 33.3% #193 1,762 0 5
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 — — — — — — —
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1989 18–15 54.5% #43 1,752 0 5
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1990 8–19 29.6% #117 1,612 0 5
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1991 6–14 30.0% #159 1,542 0 5
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 1992 11–12 47.8% #70 1,616 0 5
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 1993 5–20 20.0% #153 1,480 0 5
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 1994 2–7 22.2% #133 1,480 0 5
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 1995 6–8 42.9% #90 1,487 0 5
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 1996 4–5 44.4% #181 1,537 0 5
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 1997 0–1 0.0% #940 1,533 0 5