H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Ann Grossman H2H: 2-0

Mary Pierce holds a 2–0 lead over Ann Grossman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1997 Italian Open round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Ann Grossman
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mary Pierce #15 6-2 6-2 Ann Grossman #90 Match data May 8, 1997* R32 Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Mary Pierce #34 6-3 6-1 Ann Grossman #80 Match data Oct 24, 1991* R32 San Juan Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,145 465 218 68.1% 2 5 0 5 6 18
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,887 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Ann Grossman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,785 0 1 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0
17 1992 32–10 76.2% #13 1,900 0 4 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,055 0 5 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,748 0 0
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,007 1 7 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,638 0 0
21 1996 18–12 60.0% #24 1,881 1 7 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,733 0 0
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,066 1 8 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,804 0 0
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,124 1 12 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,032 2 15 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,665 0 0
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,838 2 15 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,751 2 15 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 — — — — — — —
29 2004 25–17 59.5% #29 1,785 2 16 — — — — — — —
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,128 2 18 — — — — — — —
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,974 2 18 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mary Pierce Ann Grossman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 12 6 18 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1992 9 2 11 81.8% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 12 4 16 75.0% 1988 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1993 19 6 25 76.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1989 16 11 27 59.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1994 15 5 20 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 12 5 17 70.6% 1990 9 12 21 42.9% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1995 25 6 31 80.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1992 15 8 23 65.2% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1997 14 6 20 70.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1998 14 6 20 70.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 1 15 93.3% 1994 16 10 26 61.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1999 24 10 34 70.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1995 5 10 15 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2000 13 6 19 68.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2001 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
28 2003 14 10 24 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 19 5 24 79.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 207 99 306 67.6% 157 72 229 68.6% 27 13 40 67.5% 74 34 108 68.5% — 111 106 217 51.2% 59 56 115 51.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 11 14 25 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mary Pierce Ann Grossman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1480 106.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1544 134.3 — — — — +3 +35 — 48.3% +0.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 1786 146.7 — — — — -38 -56 — 66.7% +1.33 6–2 (75%) 5–1 (83%) 108.5 +1.05 1987 1497 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15
17 1992 1900 149.4 — — — — -37 -50 — 75.3% +2.01 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 100.2 +3.22 1988 1699 133.9 — — — — +28 — — 54.1% +0.13 4–3 (57%) 0–5 (0%) 100.1 +0.16
18 1993 2003 165.9 — — — — -4 -109 — 70.4% +1.83 6–5 (55%) 6–9 (40%) 98.2 +1.14 1989 1737 136.2 — — — — +43 -89 — 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 4–5 (44%) 101.2 -1.22
19 1994 2055 169.7 — — — — -25 -54 — 70.9% +1.86 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 100.7 +0.50 1990 1749 136.3 — — — — -12 +8 — 51.0% +0.02 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.48
20 1995 2008 168.6 — — — — +34 -13 — 72.1% +1.78 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 94.5 +1.10 1991 1638 126.7 — — — — -16 +89 — 44.3% +0.06 3–7 (30%) 2–6 (25%) 91.9 +0.49
21 1996 1881 134.2 — — — — +65 +72 -205 58.3% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.2 +2.43 1992 1733 132.9 — — — — +24 -9 — 52.9% -0.03 6–3 (67%) 6–1 (86%) 108.7 +1.73
22 1997 2066 169.1 — — — — -62 +83 -301 68.5% +1.35 12–4 (75%) 6–3 (67%) 108.2 -4.07 1993 1805 140.5 — — — — +9 -60 — 59.6% +0.62 6–7 (46%) 6–3 (67%) 103.6 +0.77
23 1998 2124 173.3 — — — — +36 -4 — 66.0% +1.50 12–0 (100%) 3–5 (38%) 110.4 -2.64 1994 1853 146.2 — — — — 0 -73 -249 53.6% -0.01 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 107.3 -1.02
24 1999 2053 167.4 — — — — +28 +14 -309 67.8% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +1.22 1995 1681 123.7 — — — — +38 +44 — 40.8% -0.46 4–5 (44%) 3–9 (25%) 92.7 +0.33
25 2000 2033 163.9 — — — — -27 +116 — 72.3% +2.00 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 -0.29 1996 1666 130.2 — — — — +49 +8 — 42.9% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — -0.99
26 2001 1839 112.0 — — — — +44 +254 — 48.4% -0.13 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — +1.21 1997 1615 123.7 — — — — +26 +98 — 38.6% -1.25 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.1 -0.41
27 2002 1752 124.6 — — — — +10 +260 +15 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 92.5 -0.57 1998 1595 103.2 — — — — +41 +76 — 33.3% -1.58 — 1–0 — +0.11
28 2003 1787 140.5 +4.39 +0.45 1.214 53.8% -23 +157 +58 58.1% +0.66 6–4 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 98.2 -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 1785 145.7 +5.15 -0.28 1.246 53.7% -31 +86 +122 59.6% +1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 94.9 -1.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 2128 166.4 +7.54 +2.70 1.291 54.8% -48 -147 -186 71.7% +1.54 8–1 (89%) 7–5 (58%) 108.3 -3.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1975 136.3 +4.44 -0.56 1.116 52.0% -39 — — 55.9% +0.27 1–1 5–3 (63%) — -0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2145 166.5 +5.96 +1.15 1.225 53.8% -10 +27 -119 66.1% +1.33 90–58 (61%) 69–58 (54%) 101.5 -0.38 — 1888 140.3 — — — — +18 +6 -249 49.9% -0.10 53–53 (50%) 31–39 (44%) 99.5 -0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.