H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Mary Pierce vs Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario H2H: 5-5
Mary Pierce and Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario are tied 5–5 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 3–2 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2000 Hilton Head final 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5
–
5
10 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,137 | 460 | 215 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | #52 | #1 | 3,768 | 2,385 | 708 | 267 | 72.6% | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 29 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Pierce | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #81 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #18 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1992 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #13 | 1,901 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,068 | 1 | 3 |
| 18 | 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #7 | 2,081 | 1 | 5 |
| 19 | 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 56–15 | 78.9% | #5 | 2,166 | 1 | 6 |
| 20 | 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 7 | 1992 | 59–15 | 79.7% | #4 | 2,288 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 1996 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,899 | 1 | 7 | 1993 | 72–14 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,248 | 1 | 12 |
| 22 | 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,053 | 1 | 8 | 1994 | 69–9 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,333 | 3 | 20 |
| 23 | 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,120 | 1 | 12 | 1995 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #3 | 2,156 | 3 | 22 |
| 24 | 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 | 1996 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,106 | 3 | 24 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,033 | 2 | 15 | 1997 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,022 | 3 | 24 |
| 26 | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,839 | 2 | 15 | 1998 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #4 | 2,039 | 4 | 26 |
| 27 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,752 | 2 | 15 | 1999 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,932 | 4 | 27 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 | 2000 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #8 | 1,930 | 4 | 27 |
| 29 | 2004 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,754 | 2 | 16 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 4 | 29 |
| 30 | 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,119 | 2 | 18 | 2002 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,634 | 4 | 29 |
| 31 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,967 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |