H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 4-1

Mary Pierce holds a 4–1 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2000 Roland Garros fourth round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Asa Carlsson
SWE Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 6, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Mary Pierce #7 6-2 6-1 Asa Carlsson #53 Match data
Jun 21, 1997* Rosmalen WTA 250 QF Grass Asa Carlsson #34 (w/o) Mary Pierce #10 Match data
Feb 13, 1997* Paris WTA 500 R32 Carpet Mary Pierce #16 6-2 6-3 Asa Carlsson #34 Match data
Apr 8, 1994* Amelia Island WTA 250 R16 Clay Mary Pierce #12 6-2 4-6 6-2 Asa Carlsson #98 Match data
Mar 26, 1994* Houston WTA 250 SF Clay Mary Pierce #14 6-2 6-2 Asa Carlsson #156 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Asa Carlsson #1,024 #28 831 1,816 128 171 42.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Mary Pierce Asa Carlsson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #202 1,484 0 0
1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 1993 4–7 36.4% #164 1,500 0 0
1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1994 15–16 48.4% #70 1,640 0 0
1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1995 22–19 53.7% #49 1,748 0 0
1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1996 15–19 44.1% #39 1,737 0 0
1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1997 18–22 45.0% #45 1,685 0 0
1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1998 8–13 38.1% #92 1,611 0 0
1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1999 14–12 53.8% #61 1,662 0 1
1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 2000 12–16 42.9% #57 1,634 0 1
1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 2001 6–21 22.2% #102 1,515 0 1
1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 2002 12–13 48.0% #78 1,571 0 2
2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 2003 1–7 12.5% #345 1,496 0 2
2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 2004 1–5 16.7% #207 1,465 0 2
2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 — — — — — — —
2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 — — — — — — —
2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 — — — — — — —
2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 — — — — — — —
2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 — — — — — — —