H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mary Pierce vs Barbara Paulus H2H: 2-2
Mary Pierce and Barbara Paulus are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Barbara Paulus leads 2–1 on clay, while Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1998 San Diego third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 55
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 1998* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Mary Pierce | 6-3 7-5 | Barbara Paulus | Match data |
| May 14, 1998* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Barbara Paulus | 4-6 7-6 3-1 (ret.) | Mary Pierce | Match data |
| May 10, 1997* | Rome | WTA 1000 | SF | Clay | Mary Pierce | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | Barbara Paulus | Match data |
| Jul 12, 1990* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Barbara Paulus | 6-1 6-3 | Mary Pierce | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,137 | 460 | 215 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
| Barbara Paulus | #347 | #10 | 1,696 | 1,956 | 229 | 138 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Pierce | Barbara Paulus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #165 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1992 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #13 | 1,901 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #27 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #15 | 1,894 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 7 | 1991 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,868 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1996 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,899 | 1 | 7 | 1992 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #209 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,053 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,120 | 1 | 12 | 1994 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #108 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 | 1995 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #23 | 1,802 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,033 | 2 | 15 | 1996 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #13 | 1,876 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,839 | 2 | 15 | 1997 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #24 | 1,860 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,752 | 2 | 15 | 1998 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,754 | 2 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,119 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,967 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |