H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Barbara Rittner H2H: 4-1

Mary Pierce holds a 4–1 lead over Barbara Rittner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 2–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2000 Roland Garros second round 6-1 6-1.

FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 1, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Mary Pierce #7 6-1 6-1 Barbara Rittner #107 Match data
Jun 2, 1996* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Barbara Rittner #82 6-4 6-2 Mary Pierce #14 Match data
May 16, 1996* German Open WTA 1000 R32 Clay Mary Pierce #13 6-2 6-3 Barbara Rittner #80 Match data
Oct 16, 1993* Filderstadt WTA 250 QF Hard Mary Pierce #16 4-6 6-3 7-5 Barbara Rittner #35 Match data
Mar 18, 1991* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Mary Pierce #122 6-3 6-2 Barbara Rittner #84 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Barbara Rittner #438 #24 661 1,883 209 217 49.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Barbara Rittner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1990 3–3 50.0% #110 1,557 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1991 20–17 54.1% #43 1,708 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1992 23–15 60.5% #29 1,829 0 1
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1993 24–17 58.5% #34 1,838 0 1
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1994 25–18 58.1% #40 1,818 0 1
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1995 17–17 50.0% #51 1,728 0 1
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1996 12–16 42.9% #47 1,728 0 1
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1997 10–17 37.0% #71 1,653 0 1
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1998 13–14 48.1% #66 1,664 0 1
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 1999 15–18 45.5% #59 1,655 0 1
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 2000 10–12 45.5% #99 1,661 0 1
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 2001 16–18 47.1% #68 1,618 0 2
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 2002 14–19 42.4% #66 1,632 0 2
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 2003 6–14 30.0% #120 1,568 0 2
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 2004 1–2 33.3% #235 1,571 0 2