H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 5-1

Mary Pierce holds a 5–1 lead over Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1995 Zurich quarterfinal 7-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 7, 1995* Zurich WTA 1000 QF Hard Mary Pierce #4 7-6 6-4 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #14 Match data
Oct 1, 1994* Leipzig WTA 250 QF Carpet Mary Pierce #5 6-3 6-2 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #24 Match data
Apr 1, 1994* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R16 Clay Mary Pierce #13 6-2 6-1 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #24 Match data
Sep 5, 1993* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Mary Pierce #15 7-5 7-6 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #36 Match data
Jul 12, 1992* Palermo WTA 250 F Clay Mary Pierce #16 6-1 6-7 6-1 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #30 Match data
Mar 16, 1992* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #31 7-6 1-6 4-0 (ret.) Mary Pierce #16 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 — — — — — — —
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 — — — — — — —
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7