H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Elena Pampoulova H2H: 4-0

Mary Pierce holds a 4–0 lead over Elena Pampoulova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1999 Wimbledon third round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Elena Pampoulova
BUL Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Mary Pierce #7 6-3 6-0 Elena Pampoulova Match data
May 14, 1997* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Mary Pierce #11 6-2 6-3 Elena Pampoulova Match data
Apr 9, 1997* Amelia Island WTA 250 R64 Clay Mary Pierce #15 6-0 6-1 Elena Pampoulova Match data
Sep 14, 1990* Athens WTA 250 R16 Clay Mary Pierce #136 6-1 6-2 Elena Pampoulova Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Elena Pampoulova — — — 1,658 58 96 37.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Elena Pampoulova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1989 3–4 42.9% — 1,524 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1990 11–13 45.8% — 1,609 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1991 5–10 33.3% — 1,551 0 0
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1992 0–5 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1993 1–4 20.0% — 1,461 0 0
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1994 6–4 60.0% — 1,568 0 1
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1995 0–10 0.0% — 1,481 0 1
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1996 4–11 26.7% — 1,484 0 1
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1997 8–10 44.4% — 1,591 0 1
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 1998 9–8 52.9% — 1,649 0 1
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 1999 9–15 37.5% — 1,570 0 1
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 2000 1–1 50.0% — 1,575 0 1
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 2001 1–1 50.0% — 1,567 0 1
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 — — — — — — —
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 — — — — — — —