H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Elna Reinach H2H: 4-1

Mary Pierce holds a 4–1 lead over Elna Reinach in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 4–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1995 Australian Open second round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Elna Reinach
RSA Age 57

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 20, 1995* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Mary Pierce #5 6-1 6-2 Elna Reinach #69 Match data
Aug 15, 1994 Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Mary Pierce #5 6-2 6-1 Elna Reinach #64 Match data
Oct 30, 1992* San Juan WTA 250 R16 Hard Mary Pierce #17 6-3 7-5 Elna Reinach #113 Match data
Mar 15, 1992* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Mary Pierce #16 0-6 6-3 6-3 Elna Reinach #70 Match data
Aug 10, 1991* Albuquerque WTA 250 QF Hard Elna Reinach #62 6-2 6-0 Mary Pierce #41 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Elna Reinach #342 #26 33 1,865 145 170 46.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Elna Reinach
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% #273 1,495 0 0
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1985 0–1 0.0% #205 1,493 0 0
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1986 14–12 53.8% #56 1,670 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1987 10–21 32.3% #95 1,636 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1988 26–15 63.4% #28 1,812 0 0
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1989 16–17 48.5% #56 1,775 0 0
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1990 12–18 40.0% #90 1,714 0 0
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1991 15–22 40.5% #82 1,705 0 0
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1992 10–16 38.5% #109 1,655 0 0
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1993 19–17 52.8% #58 1,707 0 1
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1994 13–15 46.4% #74 1,731 0 1
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 1995 10–15 40.0% #109 1,666 0 1
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 — — — — — — —
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 — — — — — — —
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 — — — — — — —
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 — — — — — — —
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 — — — — — — —