H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Florencia Labat H2H: 2-1

Mary Pierce holds a 2–1 lead over Florencia Labat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1995 Roland Garros third round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Florencia Labat
ARG Age 55 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 4, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Mary Pierce #3 6-2 6-2 Florencia Labat #63 Match data
May 19, 1995* German Open WTA 1000 R16 Clay Mary Pierce #3 7-5 6-3 Florencia Labat #65 Match data
May 3, 1991* Taranto WTA 250 R32 Clay Florencia Labat #85 6-3 4-6 6-3 Mary Pierce #93 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Florencia Labat #106 #26 733 1,875 190 181 51.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Florencia Labat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 — — — — — — —
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1989 8–8 50.0% #77 1,546 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1990 12–18 40.0% #100 1,572 0 0
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1991 19–17 52.8% #60 1,671 0 0
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1992 18–16 52.9% #52 1,736 0 0
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1993 21–16 56.8% #51 1,764 0 0
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1994 27–15 64.3% #38 1,793 0 0
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1995 16–13 55.2% #55 1,783 0 0
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1996 24–17 58.5% #42 1,767 0 0
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 1997 21–25 45.7% #39 1,674 0 0
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 1998 13–20 39.4% #64 1,655 0 0
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 1999 3–6 33.3% #117 1,620 0 0
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 2000 8–9 47.1% #106 1,624 0 0
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 — — — — — — —
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 — — — — — — —