H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mary Pierce vs Helena Sukova H2H: 0-1
Helena Sukova holds a 1–0 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Helena Sukova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Helena Sukova won the 1991 Manhattan Beach fourth round 6-7 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1991* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Helena Sukova | 6-7 6-2 6-2 | Mary Pierce | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,137 | 460 | 215 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
| Helena Sukova | #102 | #4 | 735 | 2,217 | 580 | 297 | 66.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Pierce | Helena Sukova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1992 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #13 | 1,901 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #7 | 2,041 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 7 | 1985 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 2,028 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1996 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,899 | 1 | 7 | 1986 | 69–21 | 76.7% | #6 | 2,151 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,053 | 1 | 8 | 1987 | 58–19 | 75.3% | #7 | 2,129 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,120 | 1 | 12 | 1988 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,120 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 | 1989 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,033 | 2 | 15 | 1990 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #14 | 2,025 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,839 | 2 | 15 | 1991 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 1,958 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,752 | 2 | 15 | 1992 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 | 1993 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,925 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2004 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,754 | 2 | 16 | 1994 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,119 | 2 | 18 | 1995 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,967 | 2 | 18 | 1996 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #35 | 1,792 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,637 | 0 | 9 |