H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Joannette Kruger H2H: 4-0

Mary Pierce holds a 4–0 lead over Joannette Kruger in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2001 Canberra quarterfinal 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Joannette Kruger
RSA Age 52 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 12, 2001* Canberra WTA 250 QF Hard Mary Pierce #7 6-3 6-0 Joannette Kruger #55 Match data
May 26, 1999* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Mary Pierce #8 6-4 6-3 Joannette Kruger #82 Match data
Oct 16, 1998* Zurich WTA 1000 R16 Hard Mary Pierce #11 7-6 6-1 Joannette Kruger #28 Match data
Aug 4, 1995* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Mary Pierce #3 6-2 6-0 Joannette Kruger #41 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Joannette Kruger #972 #21 1,280 1,879 147 162 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Joannette Kruger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 — — — — — — —
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1992 2–3 40.0% #96 1,508 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1993 9–13 40.9% #128 1,575 0 0
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1994 13–17 43.3% #79 1,638 0 0
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1995 19–15 55.9% #30 1,725 0 1
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1996 7–12 36.8% #126 1,646 0 1
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1997 25–18 58.1% #27 1,791 0 2
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1998 25–22 53.2% #30 1,721 0 2
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1999 9–13 40.9% #129 1,650 0 2
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 2000 16–17 48.5% #59 1,659 0 2
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 2001 21–23 47.7% #46 1,643 0 2
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 2002 1–4 20.0% #455 1,591 0 2
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 2003 0–5 0.0% #853 1,531 0 2
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 — — — — — — —
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 — — — — — — —