H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Karina Habsudova H2H: 3-2

Mary Pierce holds a 3–2 lead over Karina Habsudova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Karina Habsudova leads 2–1 on clay, while Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1998 Paris fourth round 6-1 1-6 6-1.

FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
SVK Age 52 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 13, 1998* Paris WTA 500 R16 Carpet Mary Pierce #9 6-1 1-6 6-1 Karina Habsudova #42 Match data
May 17, 1996* German Open WTA 1000 R16 Clay Karina Habsudova #54 6-7 6-2 7-6 Mary Pierce #13 Match data
May 18, 1995* German Open WTA 1000 R32 Clay Mary Pierce #3 6-2 6-4 Karina Habsudova #28 Match data
Oct 15, 1994* Filderstadt WTA 250 SF Hard Mary Pierce #6 6-4 6-1 Karina Habsudova #61 Match data
May 6, 1994* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Karina Habsudova #108 6-2 6-3 Mary Pierce #13 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Karina Habsudova #792 #10 2,022 1,953 168 172 49.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Karina Habsudova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1990 2–1 66.7% #124 1,536 0 0
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1991 14–15 48.3% #54 1,671 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1992 9–14 39.1% #66 1,663 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1993 7–12 36.8% #113 1,627 0 0
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1994 15–12 55.6% #31 1,795 0 0
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1995 14–13 51.9% #56 1,732 0 0
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1996 36–21 63.2% #11 1,863 0 0
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1997 23–23 50.0% #29 1,756 0 0
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1998 9–17 34.6% #70 1,686 0 0
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1999 21–15 58.3% #49 1,763 0 1
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 2000 12–19 38.7% #85 1,648 0 1
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 2001 6–10 37.5% #123 1,608 0 1
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18