H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Mary Pierce vs Katerina Maleeva H2H: 1-0
Mary Pierce holds a 1–0 lead over Katerina Maleeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1992 Essen quarterfinal 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 57
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 1992* | Essen | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Mary Pierce | 6-3 7-5 | Katerina Maleeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,137 | 460 | 215 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
| Katerina Maleeva | #456 | #6 | 116 | 2,070 | 324 | 185 | 63.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Pierce | Katerina Maleeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1992 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #13 | 1,901 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,992 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 7 | 1989 | 32–11 | 74.4% | #15 | 1,940 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1996 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,899 | 1 | 7 | 1990 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,039 | 0 | 9 |
| 22 | 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,053 | 1 | 8 | 1991 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,120 | 1 | 12 | 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,906 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 | 1993 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #22 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,033 | 2 | 15 | 1994 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,866 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,839 | 2 | 15 | 1995 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #302 | 1,679 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,752 | 2 | 15 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #231 | 1,686 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,754 | 2 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,119 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,967 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |