H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 2-0

Mary Pierce holds a 2–0 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1994 Zurich third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Larisa Savchenko
URS 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 6, 1994* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Mary Pierce #5 6-3 6-3 Larisa Savchenko #46 Match data
May 28, 1992* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Mary Pierce #15 6-2 6-3 Larisa Savchenko #49 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Larisa Savchenko #305 #13 454 1,926 238 239 49.9% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Mary Pierce Larisa Savchenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,497 0 0
1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 1984 2–4 33.3% #138 1,507 0 0
1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1985 15–17 46.9% #55 1,683 0 0
1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1986 19–16 54.3% #36 1,755 0 0
1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1987 23–14 62.2% #24 1,792 0 0
1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1988 26–16 61.9% #16 1,861 0 0
1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1989 24–16 60.0% #20 1,887 0 0
1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1990 13–18 41.9% #91 1,715 0 0
1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1991 19–16 54.3% #48 1,702 0 1
1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1992 18–18 50.0% #58 1,728 0 1
1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1993 20–17 54.1% #33 1,755 0 2
2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1994 19–20 48.7% #41 1,809 0 2
2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 1995 11–20 35.5% #99 1,651 0 2
2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 1996 11–14 44.0% #61 1,669 0 2
2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 1997 8–14 36.4% #87 1,622 0 2
2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 1998 8–10 44.4% #73 1,654 0 2
2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 1999 2–8 20.0% #210 1,586 0 2
2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 — — — — — — —