H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Mary Pierce vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 1-0
Mary Pierce holds a 1–0 lead over Leila Meskhi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1992 Barcelona Olympics second round 7-6(5) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 1992* | Barcelona Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Clay | Mary Pierce | 7-6(5) 7-5 | Leila Meskhi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,145 | 465 | 218 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 1,987 | 193 | 121 | 61.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Pierce | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 32–10 | 76.2% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,054 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,007 | 1 | 7 | 1988 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,881 | 1 | 7 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,065 | 1 | 8 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,123 | 1 | 12 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 | 1992 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #22 | 1,928 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,032 | 2 | 15 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,871 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,838 | 2 | 15 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,751 | 2 | 15 | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,833 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2004 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #29 | 1,785 | 2 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,127 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,974 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |