H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Lisa Raymond H2H: 2-1

Mary Pierce holds a 2–1 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lisa Raymond won the 2003 San Diego round of 16 7-6(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Lisa Raymond
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lisa Raymond #30 7-6(5) 6-4 Mary Pierce #73 Match data Aug 1, 2003* R16 San Diego Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Mary Pierce #86 4-6 6-3 7-5 Lisa Raymond #24 Match data Jun 29, 2003* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Mary Pierce #4 6-4 7-6 Lisa Raymond #24 Match data Aug 22, 2000 R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,145 465 218 68.1% 2 5 0 5 6 18
Lisa Raymond #884 #15 1,695 1,946 327 273 54.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Lisa Raymond
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% #449 1,496 0 0
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,785 0 1 1990 0–1 0.0% #336 1,480 0 0
17 1992 32–10 76.2% #13 1,900 0 4 1991 2–1 66.7% #257 1,510 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1992 7–6 53.8% #75 1,618 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,055 0 5 1993 13–12 52.0% #55 1,692 0 0
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,007 1 7 1994 19–17 52.8% #44 1,749 0 0
21 1996 18–12 60.0% #24 1,881 1 7 1995 25–16 61.0% #20 1,812 0 0
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,066 1 8 1996 23–19 54.8% #27 1,860 0 1
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,124 1 12 1997 31–21 59.6% #17 1,913 0 1
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1998 29–21 58.0% #27 1,838 0 1
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,032 2 15 1999 22–23 48.9% #28 1,784 0 1
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,838 2 15 2000 26–20 56.5% #30 1,794 0 2
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,751 2 15 2001 33–21 61.1% #22 1,833 0 2
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 2002 29–21 58.0% #29 1,755 0 3
29 2004 25–17 59.5% #29 1,785 2 16 2003 25–18 58.1% #27 1,766 0 4
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,128 2 18 2004 20–19 51.3% #30 1,760 0 4
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,974 2 18 2005 14–19 42.4% #74 1,635 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2006 9–16 36.0% #128 1,581 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #884 1,564 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mary Pierce Lisa Raymond
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 12 6 18 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1992 9 2 11 81.8% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 12 4 16 75.0% 1991 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 19 6 25 76.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1992 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1994 15 5 20 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 12 5 17 70.6% 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1995 25 6 31 80.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1994 8 8 16 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1995 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 1997 14 6 20 70.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7%
23 1998 14 6 20 70.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 1 15 93.3% 1997 18 11 29 62.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
24 1999 24 10 34 70.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1998 13 9 22 59.1% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
25 2000 13 6 19 68.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 8 12 20 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7%
26 2001 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2001 18 12 30 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2003 14 10 24 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 21 14 35 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2003 16 11 27 59.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2005 19 5 24 79.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 2004 18 12 30 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2006 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2005 11 12 23 47.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 4 8 12 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 207 99 306 67.6% 157 72 229 68.6% 27 13 40 67.5% 74 34 108 68.5% — 175 152 327 53.5% 45 48 93 48.4% 53 36 89 59.6% 54 37 91 59.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 60/152 of Mary Pierce's and 46/141 of Lisa Raymond's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mary Pierce Lisa Raymond
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
28 2003 9/40 3.9 1.9 64.5% 68.8% 54.0% 63.9% 46.3% 63.3% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 7/42 1.6 2.1 67.0% 71.4% 54.8% 59.0% 37.4% 66.4% 41.8% 2003 7/43 2.3 4.4 53.2% 63.4% 51.5% 58.8% 57.5% 58.1% 46.0%
30 2005 28/53 3.1 1.5 68.1% 68.9% 54.4% 59.1% 48.4% 64.3% 46.0% 2004 12/39 4.1 2.8 61.4% 68.5% 46.6% 49.6% 48.7% 60.2% 43.4%
31 2006 16/17 3.5 1.4 67.3% 69.2% 47.5% 52.5% 42.1% 62.2% 42.2% 2005 5/33 2.6 4.8 66.3% 51.2% 37.5% 51.9% 31.4% 45.8% 42.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 21/25 3.0 3.9 60.0% 64.2% 46.0% 46.7% 44.4% 56.8% 37.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 2.0 4.0 58.8% 68.1% 27.3% 55.6% 50.0% 51.3% 29.3%
Career — 60/683 3.1 1.6 67.2% 69.2% 52.6% 58.1% 45.1% 63.9% 44.3% — 46/600 3.1 3.8 60.0% 63.9% 45.7% 50.1% 46.2% 56.6% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mary Pierce Lisa Raymond
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1480 106.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1544 134.3 — — — — +3 +35 — 48.3% +0.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.17 1989 1497 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.17
16 1991 1786 146.7 — — — — -38 -56 — 66.7% +1.33 6–2 (75%) 5–1 (83%) 108.5 +1.05 1990 1480 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.23
17 1992 1900 149.4 — — — — -37 -50 — 75.3% +2.01 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 100.2 +3.22 1991 1511 107.5 — — — — +27 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 — — +0.30
18 1993 2003 165.9 — — — — -4 -109 — 70.4% +1.83 6–5 (55%) 6–9 (40%) 98.2 +1.14 1992 1618 137.7 — — — — +26 — — 51.9% +0.15 1–0 0–2 — +0.38
19 1994 2055 169.7 — — — — -25 -54 — 70.9% +1.86 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 100.7 +0.50 1993 1692 137.1 — — — — -34 — +15 54.4% +0.51 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.3 +0.84
20 1995 2008 168.6 — — — — +34 -13 — 72.1% +1.78 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 94.5 +1.10 1994 1749 138.6 — — — — -41 -122 -60 55.2% +0.24 5–10 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 98.6 +0.10
21 1996 1881 134.2 — — — — +65 +72 -205 58.3% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.2 +2.43 1995 1813 147.9 — — — — -6 — -76 56.0% +0.40 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 107.8 +0.56
22 1997 2066 169.1 — — — — -62 +83 -301 68.5% +1.35 12–4 (75%) 6–3 (67%) 108.2 -4.07 1996 1861 149.8 — — — — 0 -246 -26 53.3% +0.25 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 101.3 -0.87
23 1998 2124 173.3 — — — — +36 -4 — 66.0% +1.50 12–0 (100%) 3–5 (38%) 110.4 -2.64 1997 1913 159.1 — — — — +23 -242 -109 57.9% +0.55 9–8 (53%) 7–2 (78%) 104.2 -0.65
24 1999 2053 167.4 — — — — +28 +14 -309 67.8% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +1.22 1998 1839 147.1 — — — — +16 -55 -97 56.9% +0.45 10–10 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 98.2 +0.54
25 2000 2033 163.9 — — — — -27 +116 — 72.3% +2.00 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 -0.29 1999 1784 143.4 — — — — +11 -60 -17 49.5% +0.06 9–10 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 98.1 -0.50
26 2001 1839 112.0 — — — — +44 +254 — 48.4% -0.13 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — +1.21 2000 1795 141.6 — — — — -33 -118 +163 55.0% +0.43 9–8 (53%) 2–6 (25%) 96.1 -0.19
27 2002 1752 124.6 — — — — +10 +260 +15 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 92.5 -0.57 2001 1834 151.1 — — — — -13 -128 +181 58.1% +0.74 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 101.6 -2.05
28 2003 1787 140.5 +4.39 +0.45 1.214 53.8% -23 +157 +58 58.1% +0.66 6–4 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 98.2 -0.38 2002 1755 138.0 — — — — +6 -113 +316 54.5% +0.35 8–4 (67%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 +0.97
29 2004 1785 145.7 +5.15 -0.28 1.246 53.7% -31 +86 +122 59.6% +1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 94.9 -1.86 2003 1766 139.9 +1.58 +1.47 1.097 52.3% +23 -87 +216 53.8% +0.08 13–7 (65%) 7–4 (64%) 105.7 +0.07
30 2005 2128 166.4 +7.54 +2.70 1.291 54.8% -48 -147 -186 71.7% +1.54 8–1 (89%) 7–5 (58%) 108.3 -3.66 2004 1760 142.2 +2.54 -0.29 1.089 51.9% +66 -171 +175 48.9% +0.05 10–6 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 103.9 +0.43
31 2006 1975 136.3 +4.44 -0.56 1.116 52.0% -39 — — 55.9% +0.27 1–1 5–3 (63%) — -0.83 2005 1635 122.3 -3.26 -0.74 0.782 44.6% +87 -100 +170 43.2% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.1 +2.00
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1581 121.0 +0.78 -3.50 0.877 47.3% +54 -66 +220 35.2% -0.93 3–3 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 96.0 -0.49
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1565 98.6 -2.01 +0.33 0.601 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
Career — 2145 166.5 +5.96 +1.15 1.225 53.8% -10 +27 -119 66.1% +1.33 90–58 (61%) 69–58 (54%) 101.5 -0.38 — 1947 150.2 +0.86 -1.52 0.940 48.9% +12 -115 +91 53.0% +0.26 113–94 (55%) 71–64 (53%) 102.4 +0.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.