H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Lisa Raymond H2H: 2-1

Mary Pierce holds a 2–1 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lisa Raymond won the 2003 San Diego fourth round 7-6(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Lisa Raymond
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 1, 2003* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Lisa Raymond #30 7-6(5) 6-4 Mary Pierce #73 Match data
Jun 29, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Mary Pierce #86 4-6 6-3 7-5 Lisa Raymond #24 Match data
Aug 22, 2000 US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Mary Pierce #4 6-4 7-6 Lisa Raymond #24 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Lisa Raymond #884 #15 1,695 1,945 325 272 54.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Lisa Raymond
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% #449 1,496 0 0
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1990 0–1 0.0% #336 1,480 0 0
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1991 2–1 66.7% #257 1,510 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1992 7–6 53.8% #75 1,617 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1993 13–12 52.0% #55 1,691 0 0
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1994 19–17 52.8% #44 1,749 0 0
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1995 25–16 61.0% #20 1,813 0 0
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1996 23–19 54.8% #27 1,859 0 1
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1997 31–21 59.6% #17 1,910 0 1
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1998 29–21 58.0% #27 1,837 0 1
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1999 22–23 48.9% #28 1,784 0 1
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 2000 26–20 56.5% #30 1,795 0 2
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 2001 33–21 61.1% #22 1,833 0 2
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 2002 29–21 58.0% #29 1,755 0 3
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 2003 25–18 58.1% #27 1,767 0 4
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 2004 18–18 50.0% #30 1,746 0 4
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 2005 14–19 42.4% #74 1,631 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2006 9–16 36.0% #128 1,580 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #884 1,563 0 4