H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mary Pierce vs Liz Smylie H2H: 2-0
Mary Pierce holds a 2–0 lead over Liz Smylie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1993 Brighton fourth round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1993* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mary Pierce | 6-2 6-0 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
| Aug 12, 1993* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mary Pierce | 6-4 6-3 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,137 | 460 | 215 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
| Liz Smylie | #501 | #20 | 29 | 1,824 | 161 | 188 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Pierce | Liz Smylie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #13 | 1,901 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 7 | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1996 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,899 | 1 | 7 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #36 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,053 | 1 | 8 | 1985 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,120 | 1 | 12 | 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,669 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 | 1987 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,033 | 2 | 15 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,839 | 2 | 15 | 1989 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,752 | 2 | 15 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 | 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2004 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,754 | 2 | 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,119 | 2 | 18 | 1993 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,550 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,967 | 2 | 18 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,515 | 0 | 5 |