H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Manuela Maleeva Fragniere H2H: 0-1

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 1–0 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1991 US Open round of 32 4-6 6-1 5-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
SUI Age 59 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #10 4-6 6-1 5-1 (ret.) Mary Pierce #34 Match data Sep 1, 1991* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,145 465 218 68.1% 2 5 0 5 6 18
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #5 #3 148 2,130 464 185 71.5% 0 1 0 3 15 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 1982 15–10 60.0% — 1,687 0 0
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,785 0 1 1983 21–16 56.8% — 1,788 0 0
17 1992 32–10 76.2% #13 1,900 0 4 1984 50–16 75.8% #6 2,100 0 5
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1985 46–18 71.9% #7 2,074 0 6
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,055 0 5 1986 42–21 66.7% #8 1,992 0 6
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,007 1 7 1987 44–15 74.6% #8 2,113 0 8
21 1996 18–12 60.0% #24 1,881 1 7 1988 45–15 75.0% #6 2,101 0 10
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,066 1 8 1989 34–13 72.3% #9 2,018 0 12
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,124 1 12 1990 42–16 72.4% #9 2,068 0 12
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1991 43–14 75.4% #10 2,027 0 15
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,032 2 15 1992 34–13 72.3% #9 1,998 0 16
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,838 2 15 1993 36–16 69.2% #11 2,045 0 18
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,751 2 15 1994 12–2 85.7% #5 2,067 0 19
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 — — — — — — —
29 2004 25–17 59.5% #29 1,785 2 16 — — — — — — —
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,128 2 18 — — — — — — —
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,974 2 18 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mary Pierce Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
16 1991 12 6 18 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1992 9 2 11 81.8% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 12 4 16 75.0% 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 27 5 32 84.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 6 20 70.0%
18 1993 19 6 25 76.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1985 7 4 11 63.6% 16 6 22 72.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 13 5 18 72.2%
19 1994 15 5 20 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 12 5 17 70.6% 1986 13 5 18 72.2% 13 6 19 68.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 9 8 17 52.9%
20 1995 25 6 31 80.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1987 9 3 12 75.0% 19 5 24 79.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 4 14 71.4%
21 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1988 23 5 28 82.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 5 18 72.2%
22 1997 14 6 20 70.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 1989 15 5 20 75.0% 11 3 14 78.6% — — — — 8 5 13 61.5%
23 1998 14 6 20 70.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 1 15 93.3% 1990 19 6 25 76.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7%
24 1999 24 10 34 70.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1991 16 7 23 69.6% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 17 4 21 81.0%
25 2000 13 6 19 68.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 13 4 17 76.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
26 2001 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 16 5 21 76.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6%
27 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1994 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — 8 1 9 88.9%
28 2003 14 10 24 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 19 5 24 79.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 207 99 306 67.6% 157 72 229 68.6% 27 13 40 67.5% 74 34 108 68.5% — 145 53 198 73.2% 156 62 218 71.6% 38 20 58 65.5% 125 50 175 71.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mary Pierce Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1480 106.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1544 134.3 — — — — +3 +35 — 48.3% +0.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.17 1982 1687 121.9 — — — — -88 -61 -1 55.2% +0.14 6–2 (75%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +1.61
16 1991 1786 146.7 — — — — -38 -56 — 66.7% +1.33 6–2 (75%) 5–1 (83%) 108.5 +1.05 1983 1788 136.4 — — — — -118 0 -127 57.1% +0.45 4–6 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.8 -0.81
17 1992 1900 149.4 — — — — -37 -50 — 75.3% +2.01 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 100.2 +3.22 1984 2100 169.1 — — — — -162 +37 -327 70.4% +1.55 13–7 (65%) 6–2 (75%) 112.5 -2.65
18 1993 2003 165.9 — — — — -4 -109 — 70.4% +1.83 6–5 (55%) 6–9 (40%) 98.2 +1.14 1985 2075 161.4 — — — — -47 +9 -202 70.6% +1.90 6–4 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 99.5 +0.26
19 1994 2055 169.7 — — — — -25 -54 — 70.9% +1.86 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 100.7 +0.50 1986 1992 161.4 — — — — -4 +32 -50 65.7% +1.31 7–12 (37%) 5–6 (45%) 90.2 -2.54
20 1995 2008 168.6 — — — — +34 -13 — 72.1% +1.78 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 94.5 +1.10 1987 2114 165.6 — — — — -24 -9 -171 68.6% +1.51 14–8 (64%) 4–5 (44%) 101.3 -3.96
21 1996 1881 134.2 — — — — +65 +72 -205 58.3% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.2 +2.43 1988 2102 162.5 — — — — +47 -50 — 73.1% +1.85 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 96.3 -1.34
22 1997 2066 169.1 — — — — -62 +83 -301 68.5% +1.35 12–4 (75%) 6–3 (67%) 108.2 -4.07 1989 2019 154.6 — — — — +29 +17 — 69.0% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.98
23 1998 2124 173.3 — — — — +36 -4 — 66.0% +1.50 12–0 (100%) 3–5 (38%) 110.4 -2.64 1990 2068 173.2 — — — — +58 -41 — 68.5% +1.77 9–7 (56%) 3–1 (75%) 103.3 -2.84
24 1999 2053 167.4 — — — — +28 +14 -309 67.8% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +1.22 1991 2028 159.1 — — — — +51 +26 — 72.7% +1.77 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 +1.33
25 2000 2033 163.9 — — — — -27 +116 — 72.3% +2.00 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 -0.29 1992 1999 152.0 — — — — +87 +17 -90 67.0% +1.41 10–3 (77%) 2–4 (33%) 101.2 +2.30
26 2001 1839 112.0 — — — — +44 +254 — 48.4% -0.13 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — +1.21 1993 2046 159.7 — — — — +80 -115 — 65.8% +1.04 8–7 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 99.2 -0.01
27 2002 1752 124.6 — — — — +10 +260 +15 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 92.5 -0.57 1994 2067 143.1 — — — — +48 — — 77.4% +2.36 3–0 (100%) 0–2 — +0.52
28 2003 1787 140.5 +4.39 +0.45 1.214 53.8% -23 +157 +58 58.1% +0.66 6–4 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 98.2 -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 1785 145.7 +5.15 -0.28 1.246 53.7% -31 +86 +122 59.6% +1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 94.9 -1.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 2128 166.4 +7.54 +2.70 1.291 54.8% -48 -147 -186 71.7% +1.54 8–1 (89%) 7–5 (58%) 108.3 -3.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1975 136.3 +4.44 -0.56 1.116 52.0% -39 — — 55.9% +0.27 1–1 5–3 (63%) — -0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2145 166.5 +5.96 +1.15 1.225 53.8% -10 +27 -119 66.1% +1.33 90–58 (61%) 69–58 (54%) 101.5 -0.38 — 2131 166.2 — — — — +16 -4 -133 68.1% +1.46 97–70 (58%) 48–41 (54%) 101.4 -1.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.