H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Manuela Maleeva Fragniere H2H: 0-1

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 1–0 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1991 US Open third round 4-6 6-1 5-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
Age 59 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 1991* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #10 4-6 6-1 5-1 (ret.) Mary Pierce #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #5 #3 148 2,128 458 183 71.5% 0 2 0 3 14 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 1982 15–10 60.0% — 1,688 0 0
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1983 21–16 56.8% — 1,788 0 0
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1984 50–16 75.8% #6 2,098 0 5
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1985 46–18 71.9% #7 2,073 0 6
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1986 42–21 66.7% #10 1,991 0 6
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1987 44–15 74.6% #8 2,111 0 8
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1988 42–14 75.0% #6 2,091 0 10
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1989 34–13 72.3% #9 2,016 0 12
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1990 42–16 72.4% #9 2,067 0 12
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1991 43–14 75.4% #10 2,027 0 15
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1992 31–12 72.1% #9 1,994 0 16
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 1993 36–16 69.2% #11 2,045 0 18
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 1994 12–2 85.7% #5 2,066 0 19
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 — — — — — — —
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 — — — — — — —
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 — — — — — — —
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 — — — — — — —