H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mary Pierce vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 1-0
Mary Pierce holds a 1–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1994 Leipzig fourth round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1994* | Leipzig | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mary Pierce | 6-0 6-1 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,137 | 460 | 215 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Pierce | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #13 | 1,901 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 7 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,899 | 1 | 7 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,053 | 1 | 8 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,120 | 1 | 12 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,033 | 2 | 15 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,839 | 2 | 15 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,752 | 2 | 15 | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,754 | 2 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,119 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,967 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |