H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Marlene Weingartner H2H: 2-0

Mary Pierce holds a 2–0 lead over Marlene Weingartner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2004 Canadian Open round of 64 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Marlene Weingartner
GER Age 46 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mary Pierce #28 6-1 6-1 Marlene Weingartner #72 Match data Aug 4, 2004* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Mary Pierce #5 7-5 6-3 Marlene Weingartner #99 Match data May 18, 2000* R32 Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,145 465 218 68.1% 2 5 0 5 6 18
Marlene Weingartner #1,051 #36 808 1,679 84 134 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Marlene Weingartner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 1995 1–4 20.0% #231 1,480 0 0
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,785 0 1 1996 0–1 0.0% #211 1,471 0 0
17 1992 32–10 76.2% #13 1,900 0 4 1997 3–7 30.0% #127 1,467 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1998 4–4 50.0% #104 1,510 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,055 0 5 1999 7–14 33.3% #92 1,532 0 0
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,007 1 7 2000 6–15 28.6% #87 1,493 0 0
21 1996 18–12 60.0% #24 1,881 1 7 2001 21–26 44.7% #42 1,545 0 0
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,066 1 8 2002 9–20 31.0% #97 1,482 0 0
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,124 1 12 2003 17–15 53.1% #47 1,645 0 0
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 2004 13–17 43.3% #71 1,630 0 0
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,032 2 15 2005 3–11 21.4% #381 1,509 0 0
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,838 2 15 — — — — — — —
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,751 2 15 — — — — — — —
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 — — — — — — —
29 2004 25–17 59.5% #29 1,785 2 16 — — — — — — —
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,128 2 18 — — — — — — —
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,974 2 18 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mary Pierce Marlene Weingartner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1991 12 6 18 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1992 9 2 11 81.8% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 12 4 16 75.0% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1993 19 6 25 76.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1994 15 5 20 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 12 5 17 70.6% 1999 3 5 8 37.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1995 25 6 31 80.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2001 13 17 30 43.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 1997 14 6 20 70.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 2002 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1998 14 6 20 70.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 1 15 93.3% 2003 12 7 19 63.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1999 24 10 34 70.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2004 8 12 20 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2000 13 6 19 68.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2001 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 14 10 24 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 19 5 24 79.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 207 99 306 67.6% 157 72 229 68.6% 27 13 40 67.5% 74 34 108 68.5% — 48 67 115 41.7% 26 43 69 37.7% 7 15 22 31.8% 3 9 12 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mary Pierce Marlene Weingartner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1480 106.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1544 134.3 — — — — +3 +35 — 48.3% +0.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.17 1995 1481 101.2 — — — — — +75 — 27.3% -1.82 0–1 0–1 — +0.10
16 1991 1786 146.7 — — — — -38 -56 — 66.7% +1.33 6–2 (75%) 5–1 (83%) 108.5 +1.05 1996 1471 99.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — 0.00
17 1992 1900 149.4 — — — — -37 -50 — 75.3% +2.01 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 100.2 +3.22 1997 1467 106.7 — — — — +25 +97 — 34.8% -1.48 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.51
18 1993 2003 165.9 — — — — -4 -109 — 70.4% +1.83 6–5 (55%) 6–9 (40%) 98.2 +1.14 1998 1511 116.1 — — — — +6 +47 — 50.0% -0.06 2–0 0–2 — +0.31
19 1994 2055 169.7 — — — — -25 -54 — 70.9% +1.86 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 100.7 +0.50 1999 1533 112.0 — — — — +6 +11 — 34.8% -1.74 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — -0.40
20 1995 2008 168.6 — — — — +34 -13 — 72.1% +1.78 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 94.5 +1.10 2000 1493 99.2 — — — — -1 +8 — 28.3% -1.70 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.9 +0.79
21 1996 1881 134.2 — — — — +65 +72 -205 58.3% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.2 +2.43 2001 1546 121.6 — — — — -18 +20 +50 45.5% -0.49 8–8 (50%) 9–2 (82%) 106.9 +0.06
22 1997 2066 169.1 — — — — -62 +83 -301 68.5% +1.35 12–4 (75%) 6–3 (67%) 108.2 -4.07 2002 1483 114.9 — — — — +47 +8 +62 35.5% -1.16 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 +0.40
23 1998 2124 173.3 — — — — +36 -4 — 66.0% +1.50 12–0 (100%) 3–5 (38%) 110.4 -2.64 2003 1646 127.8 -1.25 -1.46 0.767 44.3% +19 -99 -81 48.5% -0.44 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.8 -0.63
24 1999 2053 167.4 — — — — +28 +14 -309 67.8% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +1.22 2004 1631 114.1 -1.58 +1.70 0.953 48.5% -17 -24 — 43.1% -0.66 5–2 (71%) 1–3 (25%) 102.5 -0.71
25 2000 2033 163.9 — — — — -27 +116 — 72.3% +2.00 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 -0.29 2005 1510 107.7 -1.33 -2.67 0.796 45.2% +66 +24 — 31.3% -1.25 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.5 -0.27
26 2001 1839 112.0 — — — — +44 +254 — 48.4% -0.13 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — +1.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 1752 124.6 — — — — +10 +260 +15 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 92.5 -0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 1787 140.5 +4.39 +0.45 1.214 53.8% -23 +157 +58 58.1% +0.66 6–4 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 98.2 -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 1785 145.7 +5.15 -0.28 1.246 53.7% -31 +86 +122 59.6% +1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 94.9 -1.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 2128 166.4 +7.54 +2.70 1.291 54.8% -48 -147 -186 71.7% +1.54 8–1 (89%) 7–5 (58%) 108.3 -3.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1975 136.3 +4.44 -0.56 1.116 52.0% -39 — — 55.9% +0.27 1–1 5–3 (63%) — -0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2145 166.5 +5.96 +1.15 1.225 53.8% -10 +27 -119 66.1% +1.33 90–58 (61%) 69–58 (54%) 101.5 -0.38 — 1679 119.1 -1.40 -0.52 0.849 46.2% +9 +7 +7 39.8% -0.95 33–27 (55%) 17–21 (45%) 106.9 +0.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.