H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Martina Hingis H2H: 6-10

Martina Hingis holds a 10–6 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 16 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 8–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 2–2 on carpet. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2000 Roland Garros semifinal 6-4 5-7 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
6 – 10
16 main-draw meetings
Martina Hingis
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mary Pierce #7 6-4 5-7 6-2 Martina Hingis #1 Match data Jun 10, 2000* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Martina Hingis #1 6-4 6-2 Mary Pierce #6 Match data Mar 19, 2000* SF Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-4 6-3 Mary Pierce #6 Match data Mar 4, 2000* SF Scottsdale WTA 500 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-1 6-2 Mary Pierce #5 Match data Nov 15, 1999 QF WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Martina Hingis #1 6-4 6-1 Mary Pierce #6 Match data Oct 10, 1999* F Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 7-6 6-3 Mary Pierce #6 Match data Aug 21, 1999* SF Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Martina Hingis #2 6-3 6-4 Mary Pierce #7 Match data Jan 29, 1999* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Martina Hingis #2 7-6 6-4 Mary Pierce #7 Match data Nov 16, 1998 QF WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Mary Pierce #16 3-6 7-6 6-2 Martina Hingis #1 Match data Aug 8, 1998* SF San Diego Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Martina Hingis #1 6-2 6-3 Mary Pierce #9 Match data Jan 30, 1998* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Mary Pierce #7 6-3 2-6 7-5 Martina Hingis #1 Match data Nov 17, 1997 QF WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Martina Hingis #1 6-0 6-2 Mary Pierce #11 Match data Aug 2, 1997* SF San Diego Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Martina Hingis #2 6-2 6-2 Mary Pierce #14 Match data Jan 27, 1997* F Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Mary Pierce #13 7-6 6-2 Martina Hingis #16 Match data May 4, 1996* QF Hamburg Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Mary Pierce #5 6-0 6-0 Martina Hingis #21 Match data Aug 18, 1995* R16 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Mary Pierce #5 6-4 6-0 Martina Hingis #378 Match data Oct 7, 1994* R16 Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,145 465 218 68.1% 2 5 0 5 6 18
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,373 516 127 80.2% 5 17 2 16 3 43

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Martina Hingis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,825 0 0
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 1996 46–16 74.2% #4 2,157 0 2
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,785 0 1 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,313 3 14
17 1992 32–10 76.2% #13 1,900 0 4 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,287 5 26
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,055 0 5 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,318 5 35
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,007 1 7 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,126 5 38
21 1996 18–12 60.0% #24 1,881 1 7 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,051 5 40
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,066 1 8 — — — — — — —
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,124 1 12 — — — — — — —
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 2005 0–1 0.0% — 2,021 5 40
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,032 2 15 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,018 5 42
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,838 2 15 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,858 5 43
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,751 2 15 — — — — — — —
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 — — — — — — —
29 2004 25–17 59.5% #29 1,785 2 16 — — — — — — —
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,128 2 18 — — — — — — —
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,974 2 18 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mary Pierce Martina Hingis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
14 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
15 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 19 6 25 76.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 3 16 81.3%
16 1991 12 6 18 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1997 39 2 41 95.1% 11 1 12 91.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 15 2 17 88.2%
17 1992 9 2 11 81.8% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 12 4 16 75.0% 1998 31 7 38 81.6% 16 2 18 88.9% 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0%
18 1993 19 6 25 76.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1999 40 6 46 87.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 3 14 78.6%
19 1994 15 5 20 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 12 5 17 70.6% 2000 43 6 49 87.8% 12 2 14 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 15 1 16 93.8%
20 1995 25 6 31 80.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2001 39 7 46 84.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
21 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2002 28 8 36 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0%
22 1997 14 6 20 70.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1998 14 6 20 70.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 1 15 93.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1999 24 10 34 70.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2000 13 6 19 68.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 33 14 47 70.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0%
26 2001 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
27 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 14 10 24 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 19 5 24 79.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 207 99 306 67.6% 157 72 229 68.6% 27 13 40 67.5% 74 34 108 68.5% — 299 76 375 79.7% 110 26 136 80.9% 27 8 35 77.1% 80 17 97 82.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mary Pierce Martina Hingis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1596 137.2 — — — — +29 — — 66.7% +1.72 0–2 0–1 — +0.60
14 1989 1480 106.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — -0.34 1995 1826 156.2 — — — — -51 -101 — 54.1% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 111.3 -2.22
15 1990 1544 134.3 — — — — +3 +35 — 48.3% +0.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.17 1996 2157 176.6 — — — — -18 -319 -474 70.9% +1.71 8–6 (57%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -2.29
16 1991 1786 146.7 — — — — -38 -56 — 66.7% +1.33 6–2 (75%) 5–1 (83%) 108.5 +1.05 1997 2313 180.8 — — — — -10 -282 -433 82.8% +2.49 20–4 (83%) 7–4 (64%) 109.7 -0.45
17 1992 1900 149.4 — — — — -37 -50 — 75.3% +2.01 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 100.2 +3.22 1998 2264 179.3 — — — — +21 -97 -263 78.0% +2.11 11–7 (61%) 8–2 (80%) 99.7 -2.67
18 1993 2003 165.9 — — — — -4 -109 — 70.4% +1.83 6–5 (55%) 6–9 (40%) 98.2 +1.14 1999 2287 181.2 — — — — +22 -52 — 81.3% +2.39 9–3 (75%) 9–6 (60%) 100.4 -1.79
19 1994 2055 169.7 — — — — -25 -54 — 70.9% +1.86 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 100.7 +0.50 2000 2318 181.6 — — — — +43 -82 -242 83.9% +2.67 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 98.2 -3.02
20 1995 2008 168.6 — — — — +34 -13 — 72.1% +1.78 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 94.5 +1.10 2001 2127 173.7 — — — — +111 +135 — 77.2% +2.15 9–5 (64%) 7–2 (78%) 99.1 -1.01
21 1996 1881 134.2 — — — — +65 +72 -205 58.3% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.2 +2.43 2002 2051 167.3 — — — — +75 +179 — 74.0% +1.87 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.76
22 1997 2066 169.1 — — — — -62 +83 -301 68.5% +1.35 12–4 (75%) 6–3 (67%) 108.2 -4.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1998 2124 173.3 — — — — +36 -4 — 66.0% +1.50 12–0 (100%) 3–5 (38%) 110.4 -2.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1999 2053 167.4 — — — — +28 +14 -309 67.8% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +1.22 2005 2022 100.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.01
25 2000 2033 163.9 — — — — -27 +116 — 72.3% +2.00 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 -0.29 2006 2019 166.1 +3.76 +5.53 1.218 54.3% +7 +209 -3 71.3% +1.62 8–10 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 96.4 -3.22
26 2001 1839 112.0 — — — — +44 +254 — 48.4% -0.13 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — +1.21 2007 1859 147.6 +3.39 +4.14 1.205 54.0% +31 — +137 63.5% +1.15 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 91.3 +1.36
27 2002 1752 124.6 — — — — +10 +260 +15 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 92.5 -0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 1787 140.5 +4.39 +0.45 1.214 53.8% -23 +157 +58 58.1% +0.66 6–4 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 98.2 -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 1785 145.7 +5.15 -0.28 1.246 53.7% -31 +86 +122 59.6% +1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 94.9 -1.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 2128 166.4 +7.54 +2.70 1.291 54.8% -48 -147 -186 71.7% +1.54 8–1 (89%) 7–5 (58%) 108.3 -3.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1975 136.3 +4.44 -0.56 1.116 52.0% -39 — — 55.9% +0.27 1–1 5–3 (63%) — -0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2145 166.5 +5.96 +1.15 1.225 53.8% -10 +27 -119 66.1% +1.33 90–58 (61%) 69–58 (54%) 101.5 -0.38 — 2373 179.5 +3.63 +5.03 1.214 54.2% +28 -50 -259 75.7% +1.99 92–57 (62%) 53–29 (65%) 103.7 -2.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.