H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mary Pierce vs Martina Hingis H2H: 6-10
Martina Hingis holds a 10–6 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 16 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 8–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 2–2 on carpet. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2000 Roland Garros semifinal 6-4 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
6
–
10
16 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,137 | 460 | 215 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mary Pierce | Martina Hingis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 |
| 17 | 1992 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #13 | 1,901 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 |
| 18 | 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 |
| 19 | 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 |
| 20 | 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 7 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 |
| 21 | 1996 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,899 | 1 | 7 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 |
| 22 | 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,053 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,120 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,033 | 2 | 15 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 |
| 26 | 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,839 | 2 | 15 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 |
| 27 | 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,752 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,754 | 2 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,119 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,967 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |