H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Martina Navratilova H2H: 1-1

Mary Pierce and Martina Navratilova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1993 Virginia Slims Championships quarterfinal 6-1 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Martina Navratilova
USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 15, 1993 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals QF Carpet Mary Pierce #16 6-1 3-6 6-4 Martina Navratilova #3 Match data
Nov 9, 1991* Oakland WTA 250 QF Carpet Martina Navratilova #4 6-2 6-2 Mary Pierce #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,664 1,427 227 86.3% 18 8 8 15 120 168

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Martina Navratilova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 1972 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 1
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1973 20–17 54.1% — 1,761 0 2
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1974 39–20 66.1% — 1,975 0 4
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1975 81–21 79.4% — 2,218 0 7
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1976 41–16 71.9% — 2,153 0 9
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1977 67–15 81.7% — 2,243 0 15
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1978 78–9 89.7% — 2,420 1 26
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1979 91–12 88.3% — 2,428 2 36
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1980 86–12 87.8% — 2,344 2 47
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1981 90–15 85.7% — 2,407 3 57
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1982 85–3 96.6% — 2,521 5 72
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 1983 84–1 98.8% — 2,622 8 88
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,633 11 101
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,583 13 113
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,626 15 126
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,523 17 130
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,452 17 139
32 — — — — — — — 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,393 17 147
33 — — — — — — — 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,306 18 153
34 — — — — — — — 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,316 18 158
35 — — — — — — — 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,326 18 162
36 — — — — — — — 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,264 18 167
37 — — — — — — — 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 168
45 — — — — — — — 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 168
47 — — — — — — — 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 168
48 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 168