H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 3-1

Mary Pierce holds a 3–1 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 2–1 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2000 Australian Open third round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Miriam Oremans
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 23, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Mary Pierce #5 6-2 6-4 Miriam Oremans #99 Match data
Oct 8, 1994* Zurich WTA 1000 QF Carpet Miriam Oremans #65 6-4 6-7 6-3 Mary Pierce #5 Match data
Feb 13, 1992* Linz WTA 500 R32 Carpet Mary Pierce #19 6-2 6-1 Miriam Oremans #121 Match data
Feb 7, 1992* Essen WTA 250 R16 Carpet Mary Pierce #27 6-4 6-3 Miriam Oremans #127 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Miriam Oremans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 — — — — — — —
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 — — — — — — —