H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Monica Seles H2H: 4-5

Monica Seles holds a 5–4 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 3–2 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2000 Roland Garros quarterfinal 4-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 5
9 main draw meetings
Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 8, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Mary Pierce #7 4-6 6-3 6-4 Monica Seles #3 Match data
Apr 22, 2000* Hilton Head WTA 1000 SF Clay Mary Pierce #4 6-1 6-1 Monica Seles #7 Match data
Oct 26, 1998* Kremlin Cup WTA 1000 F Carpet Mary Pierce #8 7-6 6-3 Monica Seles #6 Match data
Sep 2, 1997* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Monica Seles #2 1-6 6-2 6-2 Mary Pierce #10 Match data
Jun 3, 1997* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Monica Seles #4 6-4 7-5 Mary Pierce #10 Match data
May 9, 1997* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Mary Pierce #15 7-6 7-6 Monica Seles #3 Match data
Feb 20, 1993* Paris WTA 500 QF Hard Monica Seles #1 6-2 6-2 Mary Pierce #13 Match data
Apr 25, 1992* Barcelona WTA 250 QF Clay Monica Seles #1 7-6 6-4 Mary Pierce #15 Match data
Feb 8, 1992* Essen WTA 250 SF Carpet Monica Seles #1 6-0 6-1 Mary Pierce #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Monica Seles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10
17 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7 — — — — — — —
21 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53
29 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18 — — — — — — —
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18 — — — — — — —