H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Mary Pierce vs Nancy Feber H2H: 1-0

Mary Pierce holds a 1–0 lead over Nancy Feber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1993 Brighton round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nancy Feber
BEL Age 50 Left-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mary Pierce #14 6-3 6-2 Nancy Feber #131 Match data Oct 22, 1993* R32 Brighton Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,145 465 218 68.1% 2 5 0 5 6 18
Nancy Feber #589 #79 219 1,566 25 47 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mary Pierce Nancy Feber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,785 0 1 1992 1–1 50.0% #165 1,502 0 0
17 1992 32–10 76.2% #13 1,900 0 4 1993 3–9 25.0% #152 1,486 0 0
18 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5 1994 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0
19 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,055 0 5 1995 9–12 42.9% #101 1,549 0 0
20 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,007 1 7 1996 6–12 33.3% #109 1,513 0 0
21 1996 18–12 60.0% #24 1,881 1 7 1997 2–4 33.3% #177 1,516 0 0
22 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,066 1 8 — — — — — — —
23 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,124 1 12 — — — — — — —
24 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13 — — — — — — —
25 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,032 2 15 — — — — — — —
26 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,838 2 15 — — — — — — —
27 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,751 2 15 — — — — — — —
28 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15 — — — — — — —
29 2004 25–17 59.5% #29 1,785 2 16 — — — — — — —
30 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,128 2 18 — — — — — — —
31 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,974 2 18 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mary Pierce Nancy Feber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 12 6 18 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1992 9 2 11 81.8% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 12 4 16 75.0% 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 1993 19 6 25 76.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1994 15 5 20 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 12 5 17 70.6% 1995 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1995 25 6 31 80.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1997 14 6 20 70.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1998 14 6 20 70.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 1 15 93.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1999 24 10 34 70.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2000 13 6 19 68.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2001 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 14 10 24 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 19 5 24 79.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 207 99 306 67.6% 157 72 229 68.6% 27 13 40 67.5% 74 34 108 68.5% — 10 24 34 29.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 2 6 8 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mary Pierce Nancy Feber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1480 106.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1544 134.3 — — — — +3 +35 — 48.3% +0.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 1786 146.7 — — — — -38 -56 — 66.7% +1.33 6–2 (75%) 5–1 (83%) 108.5 +1.05 1992 1502 100.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.25
17 1992 1900 149.4 — — — — -37 -50 — 75.3% +2.01 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 100.2 +3.22 1993 1487 111.8 — — — — +51 — — 26.9% -1.54 1–1 — — -0.06
18 1993 2003 165.9 — — — — -4 -109 — 70.4% +1.83 6–5 (55%) 6–9 (40%) 98.2 +1.14 1994 1483 105.3 — — — — -15 — +102 36.7% -0.73 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.24
19 1994 2055 169.7 — — — — -25 -54 — 70.9% +1.86 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 100.7 +0.50 1995 1550 117.2 — — — — -78 — +71 45.8% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — +0.43
20 1995 2008 168.6 — — — — +34 -13 — 72.1% +1.78 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 94.5 +1.10 1996 1513 113.7 — — — — -89 — +173 45.5% -0.27 0–8 (0%) 4–0 (100%) 95.3 +1.75
21 1996 1881 134.2 — — — — +65 +72 -205 58.3% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.2 +2.43 1997 1516 106.1 — — — — -48 — — 40.0% -0.70 — 2–2 (50%) — +0.12
22 1997 2066 169.1 — — — — -62 +83 -301 68.5% +1.35 12–4 (75%) 6–3 (67%) 108.2 -4.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1998 2124 173.3 — — — — +36 -4 — 66.0% +1.50 12–0 (100%) 3–5 (38%) 110.4 -2.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1999 2053 167.4 — — — — +28 +14 -309 67.8% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2000 2033 163.9 — — — — -27 +116 — 72.3% +2.00 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2001 1839 112.0 — — — — +44 +254 — 48.4% -0.13 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — +1.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 1752 124.6 — — — — +10 +260 +15 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 92.5 -0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 1787 140.5 +4.39 +0.45 1.214 53.8% -23 +157 +58 58.1% +0.66 6–4 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 98.2 -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 1785 145.7 +5.15 -0.28 1.246 53.7% -31 +86 +122 59.6% +1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 94.9 -1.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 2128 166.4 +7.54 +2.70 1.291 54.8% -48 -147 -186 71.7% +1.54 8–1 (89%) 7–5 (58%) 108.3 -3.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1975 136.3 +4.44 -0.56 1.116 52.0% -39 — — 55.9% +0.27 1–1 5–3 (63%) — -0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2145 166.5 +5.96 +1.15 1.225 53.8% -10 +27 -119 66.1% +1.33 90–58 (61%) 69–58 (54%) 101.5 -0.38 — 1567 115.2 — — — — -40 — +114 40.7% -0.55 4–16 (20%) 7–4 (64%) 94.3 +3.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.