H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Mary Pierce holds a 2–0 lead over Natalia Baudone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1994 Australian Open round of 128 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Pierce | 6-2 6-1 | Natalia Baudone | Match data | Jan 19, 1994* | R128 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Mary Pierce | 6-0 6-7 7-6 | Natalia Baudone | Match data | Sep 1, 1993* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,145 | 465 | 218 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 18 |
| Natalia Baudone | #934 | #71 | 126 | 1,682 | 38 | 58 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Pierce | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 32–10 | 76.2% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #96 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,055 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,007 | 1 | 7 | 1996 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,881 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,066 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,124 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,032 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,838 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,751 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #29 | 1,785 | 2 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,128 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,974 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Mary Pierce | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1992 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1992 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | — | — | — | — | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 1993 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 1993 | 19 | 6 | 25 | 76.0% | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1994 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 1995 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 25 | 6 | 31 | 80.6% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1996 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 21 | 4 | 25 | 84.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 14 | 1 | 15 | 93.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 24 | 10 | 34 | 70.6% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 19 | 5 | 24 | 79.2% | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 207 | 99 | 306 | 67.6% | 157 | 72 | 229 | 68.6% | 27 | 13 | 40 | 67.5% | 74 | 34 | 108 | 68.5% | Career | 21 | 29 | 50 | 42.0% | 13 | 21 | 34 | 38.2% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Mary Pierce | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1989 | 1480 | 106.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.43 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.34 | 1990 | 1502 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.80 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.23 |
| 1990 | 1544 | 134.3 | — | — | — | — | +3 | +35 | — | 48.3% | +0.52 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +0.17 | 1991 | 1465 | 96.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | 20.0% | -2.20 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.01 |
| 1991 | 1786 | 146.7 | — | — | — | — | -38 | -56 | — | 66.7% | +1.33 | 6–2 (75%) | 5–1 (83%) | 108.5 | +1.05 | 1992 | 1538 | 120.3 | — | — | — | — | +12 | +28 | — | 44.4% | -0.67 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.42 |
| 1992 | 1900 | 149.4 | — | — | — | — | -37 | -50 | — | 75.3% | +2.01 | 4–3 (57%) | 5–4 (56%) | 100.2 | +3.22 | 1993 | 1578 | 121.3 | — | — | — | — | +3 | -7 | — | 41.5% | -0.89 | 6–5 (55%) | 5–4 (56%) | 105.4 | -0.23 |
| 1993 | 2003 | 165.9 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -109 | — | 70.4% | +1.83 | 6–5 (55%) | 6–9 (40%) | 98.2 | +1.14 | 1994 | 1650 | 135.6 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 48.7% | -0.31 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.8 | -0.82 |
| 1994 | 2055 | 169.7 | — | — | — | — | -25 | -54 | — | 70.9% | +1.86 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–1 (80%) | 100.7 | +0.50 | 1995 | 1662 | 125.1 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -56 | — | 45.7% | -0.43 | 1–5 (17%) | 0–3 (0%) | 92.4 | -0.25 |
| 1995 | 2008 | 168.6 | — | — | — | — | +34 | -13 | — | 72.1% | +1.78 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–2 (50%) | 94.5 | +1.10 | 1996 | 1626 | 108.7 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -80 | — | 30.4% | -1.70 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | +0.04 |
| 1996 | 1881 | 134.2 | — | — | — | — | +65 | +72 | -205 | 58.3% | +0.64 | 6–6 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.2 | +2.43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 2066 | 169.1 | — | — | — | — | -62 | +83 | -301 | 68.5% | +1.35 | 12–4 (75%) | 6–3 (67%) | 108.2 | -4.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 2124 | 173.3 | — | — | — | — | +36 | -4 | — | 66.0% | +1.50 | 12–0 (100%) | 3–5 (38%) | 110.4 | -2.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 2053 | 167.4 | — | — | — | — | +28 | +14 | -309 | 67.8% | +1.34 | 10–7 (59%) | 12–6 (67%) | 99.5 | +1.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 2033 | 163.9 | — | — | — | — | -27 | +116 | — | 72.3% | +2.00 | 5–2 (71%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.4 | -0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 1839 | 112.0 | — | — | — | — | +44 | +254 | — | 48.4% | -0.13 | 0–3 (0%) | 2–0 | — | +1.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 1752 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | +10 | +260 | +15 | 55.0% | +0.35 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–4 (20%) | 92.5 | -0.57 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 1787 | 140.5 | +4.39 | +0.45 | 1.214 | 53.8% | -23 | +157 | +58 | 58.1% | +0.66 | 6–4 (60%) | 3–6 (33%) | 98.2 | -0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 1785 | 145.7 | +5.15 | -0.28 | 1.246 | 53.7% | -31 | +86 | +122 | 59.6% | +1.00 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–5 (29%) | 94.9 | -1.86 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 2128 | 166.4 | +7.54 | +2.70 | 1.291 | 54.8% | -48 | -147 | -186 | 71.7% | +1.54 | 8–1 (89%) | 7–5 (58%) | 108.3 | -3.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 1975 | 136.3 | +4.44 | -0.56 | 1.116 | 52.0% | -39 | — | — | 55.9% | +0.27 | 1–1 | 5–3 (63%) | — | -0.83 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2145 | 166.5 | +5.96 | +1.15 | 1.225 | 53.8% | -10 | +27 | -119 | 66.1% | +1.33 | 90–58 (61%) | 69–58 (54%) | 101.5 | -0.38 | Career | 1682 | 127.5 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -15 | — | 42.4% | -0.76 | 13–19 (41%) | 8–12 (40%) | 97.6 | -0.65 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conchita Martínez | 12 | 5 | 17 | Jul 31, 2003 | H2H |
| Martina Hingis | 6 | 10 | 16 | Jun 10, 2000 | H2H |
| Elena Likhovtseva | 8 | 4 | 12 | Oct 15, 2005 | H2H |
| Ai Sugiyama | 6 | 5 | 11 | Oct 26, 2006 | H2H |
| Anke Huber | 6 | 5 | 11 | Aug 22, 2000 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karina Habsudova | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 11, 1995 | H2H |
| Sabine Appelmans | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 17, 1996 | H2H |
| Linda Wild | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 21, 1994 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 28, 1996 | H2H |
| Patricia Hy Boulais | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 16, 1995 | H2H |