H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mary Pierce vs Natalia Baudone H2H: 2-0
Mary Pierce holds a 2–0 lead over Natalia Baudone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 1994 Australian Open first round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 51
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 1994* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mary Pierce | 6-2 6-1 | Natalia Baudone | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1993* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mary Pierce | 6-0 6-7 7-6 | Natalia Baudone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Pierce | #560 | #3 | 3,797 | 2,137 | 460 | 215 | 68.1% | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 18 |
| Natalia Baudone | #934 | #71 | 126 | 1,682 | 38 | 58 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mary Pierce | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #26 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #101 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #13 | 1,901 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 2,003 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #96 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #5 | 2,053 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #5 | 2,008 | 1 | 7 | 1996 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,899 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,053 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 35–12 | 74.5% | #7 | 2,120 | 1 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #5 | 2,053 | 1 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,033 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,839 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #52 | 1,752 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #33 | 1,786 | 2 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,754 | 2 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,119 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #79 | 1,967 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |